
                   comp.os.os2.networking.tcp_ip    (Usenet)

                 Saturday, 04-Dec-1999 to Friday, 10-Dec-1999

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: wpooh@freemail.c3.hu                              03-Dec-99 13:59:28
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 05:22:12
Subj: Re: Tiberian Network setup

From: <wpooh@freemail.c3.hu>

Hi!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 1999.12.02, 16:14:14, Melvin Tan <chong_jin@pacific.net.sg> wrote 
regarding Tiberian Network setup:
> Hello guys got some problems playing TS with multi players
Wow!
TS has been ported to OS/2? ;))

> Want to play four multi-player but usually will tell me connection 
error
> half way throught the game.
> Able to play 3 players with one hub and 3 HP Vectra 7 with no problem
> Do not wish to go thr our company server as we are afraid that it will
> damage our server
I don't think it will damage your server. Anyway this is not the right 
group asking such questions.
This group is to discuss about OS/2 tcp-ip networking not windows 
games.
Try one of these:
alt.games.command-n-conq
alt.games.command.and.conquer
comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic

bye



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: MatavNET (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: maxikins@os2bbs.com                               04-Dec-99 11:30:11
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 10:37:14
Subj: new tcpip fixpack - SYSLEVEL.TCP [1/1]

From: maxikins@os2bbs.com (Mark Klebanoff)

I have Warp 4 with the tcpip version that was briefly available on 
software choice for free.  I applied the W8610 and (and 20, I think 
but can't remember) fixpacks.  I downloaded and tried to install the 
UN0980 fixpack.  The corrective service program says I have no files 
to service.  my syslevel.tcp file is in my \tcpip\bin directory.  
Copying that file to \tcpip and the root of the boot drive didn't 
help.  I'm attaching the syslevel.tcp file so people can help figure 
it out

begin 666 SYSLEVEL.TCP
M__]365-,159%3```````````````````````````````)0```(#`#T$```!5
M3C`Q,#`Q7U5.,#$P,#!?24)-(%1#4"])4"!F;W(@5V%R<"`@("`@("`@("`@
M("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@`"`@`"`@("`@`"`@("`@
@("`@```U-C,Y038V,#`````````````````````````@
`
end

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Verio (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@b...               04-Dec-99 11:41:03
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 10:37:14
Subj: Re: SYS1719 with NETWKSTA.200

Message sender: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@bromo.email.ch

From: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@bromo.email.ch (Jens)

>     netwksta.200 is only needed for peer networking, not tcp/ip. Did you
> install that? Installing netbios-over-tcpip is only a prerequisite for
> peer network. If you are not running peer networking, you can delete
> that line.

I installed peer networking (IBMLAN). 
Ok, years ago I installed that networking stuff to play around with 
it. Since I have a standalone pc, I finally removed it from the 
config.sys and now I'm reconfiguring it.

What I want to do is making a remote tcp/ip connect and accessing the 
other networks shared disks.

But I do not want to be a server and share my resources, hence no 
"peer".
If I do not have netwksta.200, I don't have the "NET" functions (NET 
USE, NET VIEW ...)

What I found from other postings is that this SYS1719 message just 
means that the driver could not be loaded. This could be the result of
the driver terminating with an error code from the init.

Jens

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: JMS Consulting (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: bernat@mail.dotcom.fr                             04-Dec-99 14:05:06
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 10:37:15
Subj: Version of TCP/IP

From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@mail.dotcom.fr>

Hello !

I have applied some fixpacks to MPTS (WR8610) and now, when I type 
inetver, I get :
SOCKETS.SYS : 6.1002
AFOS2.SYS : 6.1000
AFINET.SYS : 6.1001
I can't apply WR8620 because it is aimed at English Warp (I am French). 
I would like to know what is my version of TCP/IP. 4.0 ? 4.1 or 4.2 ?
-- 
Vincent Bernat
 http://wguide.citeweb.net/

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: [Posted via] Easynet France (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: mgreene@exis.net                                  04-Dec-99 09:32:18
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 14:21:16
Subj: Re: new tcpip fixpack - SYSLEVEL.TCP [1/1]

From: "Michael K Greene" <mgreene@exis.net>

On Sat, 04 Dec 1999 11:30:23 GMT, Mark Klebanoff wrote:

>I have Warp 4 with the tcpip version that was briefly available on 
>software choice for free.  I applied the W8610 and (and 20, I think 
>but can't remember) fixpacks.  I downloaded and tried to install the 
>UN0980 fixpack.  The corrective service program says I have no files 
>to service.  my syslevel.tcp file is in my \tcpip\bin directory.  
>Copying that file to \tcpip and the root of the boot drive didn't 
>help.  I'm attaching the syslevel.tcp file so people can help figure 
>it out
>
>
I believe the UN0980 FP is for 4.0, you have 4.2 (with 8620 installed). If
you installed 4.1 (software choice), install 8610, un1001, and 8620.
Michael K Greene <mgreene@exis.net>     |      OS/2 Warp / Linux / Win95-311



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Exis Net Inc (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: abeagley@optonline.net                            04-Dec-99 15:57:20
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 14:21:16
Subj: "Tuning"  OS/2 for use with cable modem

From: Alan Beagley <abeagley@optonline.net>

Any default settings in TCP/IP that can/should be changed to maximize
performance with a cable-modem or xDSL connection to the Internet?

MTU, I guess, is the most obvious. What is a suitable value?

Any other settings?

Alan

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Optimum Online (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ja_besse@dds.haalditweg.nl                        04-Dec-99 18:47:16
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 14:21:16
Subj: Re: help with win98/warp4  ethernet please

From: Jeroen Besse <ja_besse@dds.haalditweg.nl>

Steve Rose wrote:
> 
> Any suuggestions (besides running Windoze on both boxes)
> will be greatly appreciated. Thanx.

Try running OS/2 on both boxes :-)

Ok, now for serious. I know OS/2 quite well, Windows less. So I'll focus
on OS/2 here.

First, you should know that sharing files and printers is done by
applications doing NetBIOS calls (via an API), both on your WinXX and
your OS/2 machine. But, you can transfer your NetBIOS-calls over (the
protocols) NETBEUI or TCP/IP. Where IBM has the strict separation
between the API and the protocol, Microsoft let you believe that the
application is talking direct TCP/IP. This is not true. But also IBM
isn't that clear, in MPTS they should have named "NetBIOS" "NetBIOS over
NETBEUI" or something like that.

So, what do you need? Three things: an application, a protocol, and a
network.

First of all, the applications. You probably already have them, for
WinXX you need something like the "client for Microsoft networks", for
OS/2 you need LAN Requester (just to connect to other computers) or also
Peer Services (to share OS/2 files and/or printers, so other computers
can connect to them).

Secondly, the protocol. In OS/2: You define them in MPTS. You can choose
between NetBEUI (called NetBIOS there) and NetBIOS over TCP/IP. The most
simple thing, is to use NetBEUI on both computers. With NetBEUI you
don't have much to do with addresses and the like. They just broadcast
each other over your network, and will find each other. For NetBIOS over
TCP/IP, this is a bit more difficult. You should check your
IP-addresses, so that the netmasks are the same. In MPTS you should both
use "TCP/IP" and "NetBIOS over TCP/IP". Settings in NetBIOS over TCP/IP
should be (Node type:) "B-node"; leave "NBNS server" and "NBDD server"
empty.

Third, you neet the network. You already have that, you said.

Finally, the (as Microsoft calls it) bindings. LAN Requester must know
the protocols, and which to use. This is defined in
C:\IBMLAN\IBMLAN.INI. In the top, you'll find one (or more) line(s)
"net1 = ..." (and "net2 = ...", etc.). These are the protocols LAN
Requester CAN use. (But they MUST be defined in MPTS!) Further down,
you'll find the line "wrknets = ...", this is which (known) protocol(s)
it WILL use.

Let's look to 3 possibilities. 1) NetBEUI; 2) NetBIOS over TCP/IP; 3)
both.

1) You'll have the lines "net1 = NETBEUI$,0,LM10,70,70,14" and "wrknets
= net1". (Numbers can change, this is about tuning.)
2) You'll have the lines "net1 = TCPBEUI$,0,LM10,70,70,14" and "wrknets
= net1". (Again: numbers can change in your situation.)
3) You'll have the lines "net1 = NETBEUI$,0,LM10,70,70,14", "net2 =
TCPBEUI$,1,LM10,70,70,14", and "wrknets = net1,net2". (Again: numbers
can change in your situation.) Also, in MPTS you should change the
"logical adapter number" for NetBIOS over TCP/IP to 1 (correspondents
with the "1" after TCPBEUI$).

Again, the easiest way is 1. In this case, you can add "TCP/IP" in MPTS,
so that real IP-programs can find the other computer as well. LAN
Requester will run on NetBEUI. Option 3 is really something for the
experienced... (there are some caveats).

If you first install and configure MPTS, then the installation of LAN
Requester (and Peer Services) will do the IBMLAN.INI trick for you.

Hope this gets you on your way.

Best regards,
Jeroen Besse

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: ING Groep (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca                           04-Dec-99 18:08:24
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 14:21:16
Subj: Re: "Tuning"  OS/2 for use with cable modem

From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca (Lorne Sunley)

On Sat, 4 Dec 1999 15:57:40, Alan Beagley <abeagley@optonline.net> 
wrote:

> Any default settings in TCP/IP that can/should be changed to maximize
> performance with a cable-modem or xDSL connection to the Internet?
> 
> MTU, I guess, is the most obvious. What is a suitable value?
> 
> Any other settings?
> 

The best thing is to make sure you have the 32-bit
stack for TCP/IP. This is the WR8610 MPTS refresh
and the WR8620 fixpack sytle update. The 32-bit
stack is faster than the Warp 4 GA 16-bit stack.

MTU is supposedly negotiated between the connecting
parties (up the max set AFAIK).

--

Lorne Sunley

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: MBnet Networking Inc. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca                           04-Dec-99 18:06:04
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 14:21:16
Subj: Re: Version of TCP/IP

From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca (Lorne Sunley)

On Sat, 4 Dec 1999 13:05:13, Vincent Bernat <bernat@mail.dotcom.fr> 
wrote:

> Hello !
> 
> I have applied some fixpacks to MPTS (WR8610) and now, when I type 
> inetver, I get :
> SOCKETS.SYS : 6.1002
> AFOS2.SYS : 6.1000
> AFINET.SYS : 6.1001
> I can't apply WR8620 because it is aimed at English Warp (I am French). 
> I would like to know what is my version of TCP/IP. 4.0 ? 4.1 or 4.2 ?

The versions of MPTS and TCP/IP are separate.

MPTS is the stack and you are at version 5.4
although the references to stack patches sometimes
say "latest41" which is the WR8600 stack (I think)

TCP/IP is the applications (like FTP, TELNET etc)
and you will be at whatever version you installed on
your system. Warp 4 GA is 4.0 applications.

There is a page at http://www.warpupdates.de which
seems to have a fairly coherent description of the
versions and updates (which is an amazing thing
given the Tower of Babel that surrounds the nomenclature
for MPTS and TCP/IP versions and updates)

--

Lorne Sunley

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: MBnet Networking Inc. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: pNoOrStPiAgM@attglobal.net                        04-Dec-99 18:59:06
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 16:31:18
Subj: Re: Remote Access to OS/2 (eg. MS NetMeeting)

From: pNoOrStPiAgM@attglobal.net (Harald Portig)

On Fri, 3 Dec 1999 20:18:17, alex@eddie.cis.uoguelph.ca (Alex Taylor) 
wrote:

> This looks like an interesting program, looking around the web page.
> I'm evaluating possibilities for this kind of thing myself (Netfinity
> is nice, but kind of slow).

DTOC is somewhat slow also, cannot compare it to Netfinity, though, 
because I never have used it.  It seems to load the server pretty 
heavily -- the load meter in WarpCenter on the server is at about 65% 
CPU load.  The server has a Pentium II, 300 MHz, 128 Mb RAM.
 
> I couldn't find anything about trial versions or evaluations, though...
> just an ordering link.  Is there such a thing?  I'm certainly not going
> to buy something without being able to try it out first...

I seem to remember that on the webpages where one can buy this program
there is mention of a procedure to return an electronically purchased 
program.  This may be on the download page.  Of course I don't know 
how well that works. 

Regards,
Harald Portig

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & Ne
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: pvolsted@image.dk                                 04-Dec-99 18:04:06
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 16:31:19
Subj: Re: Version of TCP/IP

From: peter volsted <pvolsted@image.dk>

hi

> Vincent Bernat wrote:
-----

>
> I would like to know what is my version of TCP/IP. 4.0 ? 4.1 or 4.2 ?

-----

>From command line run: syslevel
That will output more information than you ask for.

good luck

peter


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: sma@spam-not.rtd.com                              04-Dec-99 19:03:11
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 16:31:19
Subj: Re: SYS1719 with NETWKSTA.200

From: James Moe <sma@spam-not.rtd.com>


Jens wrote:
> 
> 
> What I want to do is making a remote tcp/ip connect and accessing the
> other networks shared disks.
> 
  Using just the tcp/ip programs? Like FTP, RSH, REXEC, TELNET?
  What kind of OS's are the remote systems running? What kind of
networking are they running?

> But I do not want to be a server and share my resources,
>
  Having peer running on your computer does not make it a server,
although it may offer services. You are _not_ required to share
resources. You have complete control over what is or is not made
available to other systems.

> hence no "peer".
> If I do not have netwksta.200, I don't have the "NET" functions (NET
> USE, NET VIEW ...)
> 
  You must be running peer to have the NET functions.

> What I found from other postings is that this SYS1719 message just
> means that the driver could not be loaded. This could be the result of
> the driver terminating with an error code from the init.
> 
  It could not be loaded because it could not be found. sys1719 quite
clearly states that. Other messages (netxxxx and sysxxxx) indicate
problems that occur when the driver loads but fails to initialize.

-- 

sma at rtd dot com
Remove "spam-not." for email

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Northlink (northlink.com) (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: bernat@mail.dotcom.fr                             04-Dec-99 20:10:05
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 16:31:19
Subj: Re: MPTS does not configure ?

From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@mail.dotcom.fr>

In article <vImTVl25inkn-pn2-6borhmObswfJ@on-tline.de>, 
jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@bromo.email.ch says...

> If I start MPTS, I cannot click the "configure" button, only 
> "install".
> I have a standalone PC and so I installed TCP/IP manually, never used 
> MPTS or TCPIPCFG.
> But now I wanted to try TCPBEUI. Where does MPTS look for to check if 
> "configure" is possible ?

I have the same problem. It disappears when I launch MPTS from its 
directory.
Well, I just checked this and finally, you must just launch MPTS from 
any directory except the root directory. I don't know why. 
-- 
Vincent Bernat
 http://wguide.citeweb.net/

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: [Posted via] Easynet France (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: maxikins@os2bbs.com                               04-Dec-99 19:34:03
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 16:31:19
Subj: Re: new tcpip fixpack - SYSLEVEL.TCP [1/1]

From: maxikins@os2bbs.com (Mark Klebanoff)

thanks

On Sat, 4 Dec 1999 14:32:36, "Michael K Greene" <mgreene@exis.net> 
wrote:

> On Sat, 04 Dec 1999 11:30:23 GMT, Mark Klebanoff wrote:
> 
> >I have Warp 4 with the tcpip version that was briefly available on 
> >software choice for free.  I applied the W8610 and (and 20, I think 
> >but can't remember) fixpacks.  I downloaded and tried to install the 
> >UN0980 fixpack.  The corrective service program says I have no files 
> >to service.  my syslevel.tcp file is in my \tcpip\bin directory.  
> >Copying that file to \tcpip and the root of the boot drive didn't 
> >help.  I'm attaching the syslevel.tcp file so people can help figure 
> >it out
> >
> >
> I believe the UN0980 FP is for 4.0, you have 4.2 (with 8620 installed). If
> you installed 4.1 (software choice), install 8610, un1001, and 8620.
> Michael K Greene <mgreene@exis.net>     |      OS/2 Warp / Linux / Win95-311
> 
> 
> 


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: sma@spam-not.rtd.com                              04-Dec-99 22:34:05
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 19:48:22
Subj: Re: Socket timeouts

From: James Moe <sma@spam-not.rtd.com>


Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> 
> Hi, all,
> 
> I'm not a TCP/IP expert, but here goes...
> 
> I have a problem with Injoy dial-on-demand.  Sometimes it takes so long
> for the connection to be made that whatever request triggered the DOD
> times out.  Is there a way to lengthen the timeout parameters for
> TCP/IP?  I don't see anything in the MPTS or TCP/IP notebooks.
> 
  I do not think there is. It may be an application issue.
  You might get a better answer at the IN-Joy site: http://www.fx.dk


-- 

sma at rtd dot com
Remove "spam-not." for email

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Northlink (northlink.com) (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: starose@pyramid.net                               04-Dec-99 15:01:23
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 19:48:22
Subj: Re: help with win98/warp4  ethernet please

From: "Steve Rose" <starose@pyramid.net>

Steve Rose <starose@pyramid.net> wrote in message
news:Q3R14.2026$8H.12927@newsfeed.slurp.net...
>Thanx,  I have option 3  installed and booting up without errors. This
website was a big help http://www.mit.edu/activities/os2/peer/WARPPEER.HTM .
Network Neighborhood now sees my OS2 box but  still doesn't access any
resources.
when I go to OS/2 Peer\Network DDE and click on active workstations it shows
my windows machine. When I hit check it says the other machine doesn;t have
DDE installed.
Pings are successful in both directions.
I am using FAT32 but even if that were a problem, the OS/2 machine should
still see the other drives(floppy,and CDrom and hopefully the zip as well),
Right?
And I am not using HPFS so Windows should see all the drives, Right?
But  they don't.
I feel like I am real close and probably overlooking something real simple.
>
>


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca                           04-Dec-99 23:58:12
  To: All                                               04-Dec-99 19:48:22
Subj: Re: help with win98/warp4  ethernet please

From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca (Lorne Sunley)

On Sat, 4 Dec 1999 23:01:46, "Steve Rose" <starose@pyramid.net> wrote:

> 
> Steve Rose <starose@pyramid.net> wrote in message
> news:Q3R14.2026$8H.12927@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> >Thanx,  I have option 3  installed and booting up without errors. This
> website was a big help http://www.mit.edu/activities/os2/peer/WARPPEER.HTM .
> Network Neighborhood now sees my OS2 box but  still doesn't access any
> resources.
> when I go to OS/2 Peer\Network DDE and click on active workstations it shows
> my windows machine. When I hit check it says the other machine doesn;t have
> DDE installed.
> Pings are successful in both directions.
> I am using FAT32 but even if that were a problem, the OS/2 machine should
> still see the other drives(floppy,and CDrom and hopefully the zip as well),
> Right?
> And I am not using HPFS so Windows should see all the drives, Right?
> But  they don't.
> I feel like I am real close and probably overlooking something real simple.

Using HPFS or FAT does not affect the visibility of shares on
the OS/2 machine. As a matter of fact HPFS is more efficient
than FAT for disk access.

Did you actually share a drive or printer. On the OS/2 box
you just have to "right click" on a printer or folder and choose
the "Sharing" menu item.

--

Lorne Sunley

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: MBnet Networking Inc. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jpolt@bradnet.legend.co.uk                        05-Dec-99 01:28:00
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 03:19:15
Subj: Re: www.lotus.com

From: jpolt@bradnet.legend.co.uk (John Poltorak)

In <38446092.9DA25F5C@attglobal.net>, Alon Stewart <abstewa@attglobal.net>
writes:
>It must be something in your browser settings, I have NS 4.61 and OS/2 and I
can access
>both sites you mentioned with no problem on 28.8 modem.  I have seen very few 
sites
>that I can not get, unless they have weird plugins required.

It looks like the problem was completely beyond my control, since I am no
longer
having the same problems. I have not changed any settings, but all of a sudden 

I have no problems connecting to Lotus or even Palm whose home page I have
never been able to load before. Maybe my ISP has sorted out some problem....

--
John

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Legend Internet Ltd (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: esimon@ifu.net                                    04-Dec-99 22:25:01
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 03:19:16
Subj: warp 3.0

From: "edsimon" <esimon@ifu.net>

is this program any good.  can I use it to network?  can I run apache
webserver on warp 3.0?  I don't want to spend any money on upgrading it to
warp 4.

thanks
esimon


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jstucklex@attglobal.net                           04-Dec-99 22:19:08
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 03:19:16
Subj: Re: Socket timeouts

From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>

James,

Thanks for the note.  It's not an Injoy problem - I've played around
with it some, and written my own program to do a socket connect and
report the error.  I can duplicate it reliably by extending the timeout
on Injoy's logon from 2 seconds to 30 seconds - the socket connect times
out before the dialer gets past the delay.  And, with a 2 second
timeout, it works - most of the time - but if there's any delay in the
logon sequence, the programs time out.

The actual problem here is with setiathome - if it gets a timeout, it
waits an hour to try again.  I don't really want to shorten this delay -
sometimes the server is down.  But I would like to increase the time
TCP/IP waits for a socket connection before timing out.

Thanks anyway for trying to help - it does look like I'm not going to be
able to do it!

James Moe wrote:
> 
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> >
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > I'm not a TCP/IP expert, but here goes...
> >
> > I have a problem with Injoy dial-on-demand.  Sometimes it takes so long
> > for the connection to be made that whatever request triggered the DOD
> > times out.  Is there a way to lengthen the timeout parameters for
> > TCP/IP?  I don't see anything in the MPTS or TCP/IP notebooks.
> >
>   I do not think there is. It may be an application issue.
>   You might get a better answer at the IN-Joy site: http://www.fx.dk
> 
> --
> 
> sma at rtd dot com
> Remove "spam-not." for email

-- 

=======================================================
To reply, delete the "x" from my email address

Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
JDS Computer Training Corp.
Sun Certified Java Programmer
VisualAge/Java Certified Advanced Technical Expert
VisualAge/C++ Certified Developer

=======================================================

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: JDS Computer Training Corp. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: whonea@codenet.net                                04-Dec-99 20:47:19
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 03:19:16
Subj: Re: SYS1719 with NETWKSTA.200

From: whonea@codenet.net (Will Honea)

On Fri, 3 Dec 1999 21:59:35, lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca (Lorne Sunley) 
wrote:

> On Fri, 3 Dec 1999 21:48:31, 
> jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@bromo.email.ch (Jens) wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I always get SYS1719 from NETWKSTA.200 while booting (no other error 
> > message) and netwksta.200 is not installed.
> > 
> > I tried to use netbios over tcp/ip. I have a standalone-pc (no network
> > card) with tcp-dialup.
> > Lantran.log shows no errors.
> > I read the newsgroups, the web-pages referring to that, changed my 
> > configuration, booted 20 times...no result - NETWKSTA.200 won't load.
> > Maybe something is wrong with ibmlan.ini, but there is no way to test 
> > it.
> > 
> > So, is there any way to debug this ? Is there some utility to load or 
> > to simulate loading of the netwksta.200 after I have booted ?
> 
> Have you tried using the Software Parallel Port NIC
> so that there is an interface for NETBIOS or NETBIOS/TCPIp
> to bind to?
> 
> Use MPTS to select SSW Parallel Port NIC-less adaptor
> and configure that with the protocols.

I've had better luck choosing the 'IBM NULL MAC driver' when I have no
card installed.  The Parellel Port driver caused intermittent problems
when the printer port was actually in use for a printer.  The other 
advantage is that you can have multiple definitions for the NULL 
driver and play bridging/routing games if you need to get fancy.

Will Honea <whonea@codenet.net>

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: DAMNSPAMMERSks@karicobs.com                       05-Dec-99 05:00:20
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 03:19:16
Subj: "Tuning" OS/2 for use with cable modem

From: DAMNSPAMMERSks@karicobs.com (ks@karicobs.com)

Saturday December 04 1999 15:57, Alan Beagley wrote to All:


 AB> Any default settings in TCP/IP that can/should be changed to 
 AB> maximize
 AB> performance with a cable-modem or xDSL connection to the Internet?

It is a regular ethernet connection. Nothing to do with how you 
connect.

 KS


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: bbs.karicobs.com - Toronto, Canada (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: starose@pyramid.net                               04-Dec-99 22:50:24
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 03:19:16
Subj: Re: help with win98/warp4  ethernet please

From: "Steve Rose" <starose@pyramid.net>

Steve Rose <starose@pyramid.net> wrote in message
news:Q3R14.2026$8H.12927@newsfeed.slurp.net...
>I dont get any sharing options on any right clicks except on my windows
machine
Does this mean I don;t have File and orint sharing installed?
>
>


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@b...               05-Dec-99 09:39:18
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 10:37:07
Subj: Re: SYS1719 with NETWKSTA.200

Message sender: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@bromo.email.ch

From: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@bromo.email.ch (Jens)

>   Using just the tcp/ip programs? Like FTP, RSH, REXEC, TELNET?
>   What kind of OS's are the remote systems running? What kind of
> networking are they running?

WinNT
 
> > What I found from other postings is that this SYS1719 message just
> > means that the driver could not be loaded. This could be the result of
> > the driver terminating with an error code from the init.
> > 
>   It could not be loaded because it could not be found. sys1719 quite
> clearly states that. Other messages (netxxxx and sysxxxx) indicate
> problems that occur when the driver loads but fails to initialize.

What I found while searching in DejaNews was that others had the same 
problem if they had errors in their configuration, so it seems that 
this message is misleading. I assume that the driver terminates 
FS_INIT with an error code so the system says it could not be loaded.

Jens

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: JMS Consulting (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: zayne@omen.com.au                                 05-Dec-99 09:51:29
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 10:37:07
Subj: Re: warp 3.0

From: zayne@omen.com.au (Mooo)

"edsimon" <esimon@ifu.net> wrote:

>is this program any good.

Yes.  Its functionaly the same as Warp4 for all intents and purposes.


>  can I use it to network?

Depends of which version you have.  If you have Warp Connect you can
network, if not, you have the workstation edition which can only be
networked with Warp Server (via lanrequester).


>  can I run apache
>webserver on warp 3.0?

Sure.  If you have a network edition.


>  I don't want to spend any money on upgrading it to
>warp 4.

No worries.  I was running Warp3 Connect for years after Warp4 was
available.  I only recently changed to Warp 4.5 (from Warp Server for
e-Business) because I wanted to test the new OS out a bit.

Craig

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Nothing I say is my own opinion (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: j1hamilton@aol.com                                05-Dec-99 13:26:19
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 14:26:02
Subj: Re: "Tuning"  OS/2 for use with cable modem

From: j1hamilton@aol.com (J1Hamilton)

>The best thing is to make sure you have the 32-bit
>stack for TCP/IP. This is the WR8610 MPTS refresh
>and the WR8620 fixpack sytle update. The 32-bit
>stack is faster than the Warp 4 GA 16-bit stack.
>

     Sorry to but into your conversation, but will this 32 bit stack still
work
in concert with the DOS TCP/IP that WinOS2 uses??
                            Jerry Hamilton

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: AOL http://www.aol.com (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: dcasey@ibm.net                                    05-Dec-99 08:39:06
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 14:26:02
Subj: Re: warp 3.0

From: dcasey@ibm.net (Dan Casey)

In article <jKk24.1072$w92.12713@newsfeed.slurp.net>,
"edsimon" <esimon@ifu.net> wrote:
>is this program any good.  can I use it to network?  can I run apache
>webserver on warp 3.0?  I don't want to spend any money on upgrading it to
>warp 4.

Yes, it's quite good.
No, you can't network with it.

Warp 3 shipped with an Internet Access Kit (IAK) on the Bonus Pack
CDROM that provides dila-up TCP/IP *only*. For networking, you'll need
Warp Connect (the network-enabled version of Warp 3) or Warp 4.

Check e-Bay. There are always copies of Warp Connect and Warp 4 going
fairly cheap in there.

--
**************************************************************
*  Dan Casey                                                 *
*  President                                                 *
*  V.O.I.C.E. (Virtual OS/2 International Consumer Education *
*  http://www.os2voice.org                                   *
*  Abraxas on IRC                                            *
*  http://members.iquest.net/~dcasey                         *
*  Charter Associate member, Team SETI                       *
*  Warpstock 99 in Atlanta  http://www.warpstock.org         *
**************************************************************
*  E-Mail (subject: Req. PGP Key) for Public Key             *
**************************************************************

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: V.O.I.C.E., Indianapolis, IN (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: leea@psynet.net                                   05-Dec-99 08:49:26
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 14:26:03
Subj: Re: Socket timeouts

From: Lee Aroner  <leea@psynet.net>

Have a look at the value for KEEPALIVE in INETCFG.EXE. Just do 
a: "INETCFG -g all" and post what you get. You might also post 
your MPTCFG.INI file.

LRA

------------------------
  From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
  Subject: Re: Socket timeouts
  Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 22:19:17 -0500 
  To: "comp.os.os2.networking.tcp-ip" 
<@news:comp.os.os2.networking.tcp-ip@192.168.16.2>


> James,
> 
> Thanks for the note.  It's not an Injoy problem - I've 
played around
> with it some, and written my own program to do a socket 
connect and
> report the error.  I can duplicate it reliably by extending 
the timeout
> on Injoy's logon from 2 seconds to 30 seconds - the socket 
connect times
> out before the dialer gets past the delay.  And, with a 2 
second
> timeout, it works - most of the time - but if there's any delay in the
> logon sequence, the programs time out.
> 
> The actual problem here is with setiathome - if it gets a timeout, it
> waits an hour to try again.  I don't really want to shorten this delay -
> sometimes the server is down.  But I would like to increase the time
> TCP/IP waits for a socket connection before timing out.
> 
> Thanks anyway for trying to help - it does look like I'm not going to be
> able to do it!
> 
> James Moe wrote:
> > 
> > Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, all,
> > >
> > > I'm not a TCP/IP expert, but here goes...
> > >
> > > I have a problem with Injoy dial-on-demand.  Sometimes it takes so long
> > > for the connection to be made that whatever request triggered the DOD
> > > times out.  Is there a way to lengthen the timeout parameters for
> > > TCP/IP?  I don't see anything in the MPTS or TCP/IP notebooks.
> > >
> >   I do not think there is. It may be an application issue.
> >   You might get a better answer at the IN-Joy site: http://www.fx.dk
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > sma at rtd dot com
> > Remove "spam-not." for email
> 
> -- 
> 
> =======================================================
> To reply, delete the "x" from my email address
> 
> Jerry Stuckle
> jstucklex@attglobal.net
> JDS Computer Training Corp.
> Sun Certified Java Programmer
> VisualAge/Java Certified Advanced Technical Expert
> VisualAge/C++ Certified Developer
> 
> =======================================================
> 

---------------End of Original Message-----------------

--------------------------------------------------------
Name: Lee Aroner
E-mail: Lee Aroner <leea@nospm.psynet.net>

(Please remove "nospm." to reply...)

Date: 12/05/1999
Time: 08:49:54

 _,_ /|
 \`o.O' ACK!
 =(___)=
    U

--------------------------------------------------------

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: bCandid - Powering the world's discussions - http
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: sma@spam-not.rtd.com                              05-Dec-99 20:44:00
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 19:50:28
Subj: Re: SYS1719 with NETWKSTA.200

From: James Moe <sma@spam-not.rtd.com>


Jens wrote:
> 
> >   Using just the tcp/ip programs? Like FTP, RSH, REXEC, TELNET?
> >   What kind of OS's are the remote systems running? What kind of
> > networking are they running?
> 
> WinNT
> 
  You _definitely_ need peer networking then. Install the
Netbios-over-tcpip in MPTS to enable the protocol. Then (re-)install
peer. (If you had a bad install, try uninstalling it first.)

-- 

sma at rtd dot com
Remove "spam-not." for email

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Northlink (northlink.com) (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@b...               05-Dec-99 22:16:15
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 19:50:29
Subj: Re: SYS1719 with NETWKSTA.200

Message sender: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@bromo.email.ch

From: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@bromo.email.ch (Jens)

>   You _definitely_ need peer networking then. Install the
> Netbios-over-tcpip in MPTS to enable the protocol. Then (re-)install
> peer. (If you had a bad install, try uninstalling it first.)

Yes, I know, I have done all that...won't work.
Maybe the problem is that I don't have a network card so at driver 
initialization there is no interface ?

Jens

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: JMS Consulting (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: oliver.rick@oor.de                                04-Dec-99 23:12:19
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 19:50:29
Subj: Re: Version of TCP/IP

From: oliver.rick@oor.de (Oliver Rick)

On Sat, 04 Dec 1999 Vincent Bernat wrote:

> I have applied some fixpacks to MPTS (WR8610) and now, when I type
> inetver, I get :
> SOCKETS.SYS : 6.1002
> AFOS2.SYS : 6.1000
> AFINET.SYS : 6.1001
> I can't apply WR8620 because it is aimed at English Warp (I am French).

Do you have any errors that have been fixed in WR08620? If not, don't
apply it. You won't miss anything. ;-)

> I would like to know what is my version of TCP/IP. 4.0 ? 4.1 or 4.2 ?

If you have Warp 3 your TCP/IP version is a subset of 2.0.
If you have Warp Connect your TCP/IP version is 3.0.
If you have Warp 4 your TCP/IP version is 4.0.
If you have installed the TCP/IP 4.1 package the version is ...

You have applied MPTS FixPak WR?8610, so your TCP/IP *stack* is at 4.2.
For the TCP/IP *services* one of the above four lines is valid. If you
have Warp Connect you may upgrade to TCP/IP services 4.0. I have just
seen new CSD for 3.1/4.0. I have to check it first and then I will add
the information to the TCP/IP section of my site.

Package = MPTS (including stack) + services. Both components are serviced
separately (FixPak and Corrective Service Diskettes).

   /Olli/
--
IBM OS/2 Warp Update Summary:
http://www.warpupdates.de/english/warpupdates.html

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Out of Rosenheim/2 (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: mmellin@home.com                                  06-Dec-99 00:47:21
  To: All                                               05-Dec-99 21:17:16
Subj: Networking a HP LaserJet4...

From: mmellin@home.com (Mark Mellin)

Any ideas on how to connect/configure Warp4 as the print server on
a HP LaserJet4 using HP's JetDirect card across a 10-BaseT peer
network with TCP/IP ??

I couldn't & didn't find any JetDirect software for OS/2 on HP's
or IBM's driver site(s).

My telenet'd config for the Jetdirect card is as follows:

===JetDirect Telnet Configuration===

        Configured Parameters
        IP Address      : 192.168.1.5
        Subnet Mask     : 255.255.255.0
        Default Gateway : 192.168.1.5
        Syslog Server   : 192.168.1.1
        Idle Timeout    : 90 Seconds


Everything seems to be connected and working properly...

Thanks in advance for any help.
Mark

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: @Home Network (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca                           05-Dec-99 18:01:06
  To: All                                               06-Dec-99 03:38:14
Subj: Re: "Tuning"  OS/2 for use with cable modem

From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca (Lorne Sunley)

On Sun, 5 Dec 1999 13:26:39, j1hamilton@aol.com (J1Hamilton) wrote:

<snip>
> 
>      Sorry to but into your conversation, but will this 32 bit stack still
work
> in concert with the DOS TCP/IP that WinOS2 uses??
>                             Jerry Hamilton


Yes, at least when it is set up correctly for the DOS TCP/IP

--

Lorne Sunley

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: MBnet Networking Inc. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ktkelvin@yahoo.com                                06-Dec-99 09:35:29
  To: All                                               06-Dec-99 03:38:14
Subj: Re: Networking a HP LaserJet4...

From: "Kelvin Tsang" <ktkelvin@yahoo.com>

Why ?  The JetAdmin for OS/2 is comes with the JetDirect.
Or you may find it easily at HP's homepage :
http://www.hp.com/cposupport/prodhome/hpjetadmin1877.html
Kelvin



Mark Mellin g峹 ...
>Any ideas on how to connect/configure Warp4 as the print server on
>a HP LaserJet4 using HP's JetDirect card across a 10-BaseT peer
>network with TCP/IP ??
>
>I couldn't & didn't find any JetDirect software for OS/2 on HP's
>or IBM's driver site(s).
>
>My telenet'd config for the Jetdirect card is as follows:
>
>===JetDirect Telnet Configuration===
>
>        Configured Parameters
>        IP Address      : 192.168.1.5
>        Subnet Mask     : 255.255.255.0
>        Default Gateway : 192.168.1.5
>        Syslog Server   : 192.168.1.1
>        Idle Timeout    : 90 Seconds
>
>
>Everything seems to be connected and working properly...
>
>Thanks in advance for any help.
>Mark
>


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: IMS Netvigator (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: mgreene@exis.net                                  05-Dec-99 23:19:01
  To: All                                               06-Dec-99 03:38:15
Subj: Re: Version of TCP/IP

From: "Michael K Greene" <mgreene@exis.net>

On Sat, 04 Dec 99 23:12:38 +0100, Oliver Rick wrote:

>
>On Sat, 04 Dec 1999 Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
>> I have applied some fixpacks to MPTS (WR8610) and now, when I type
>> inetver, I get :
>> SOCKETS.SYS : 6.1002
>> AFOS2.SYS : 6.1000
>> AFINET.SYS : 6.1001
>> I can't apply WR8620 because it is aimed at English Warp (I am French).
>
>Do you have any errors that have been fixed in WR08620? If not, don't
>apply it. You won't miss anything. ;-)
>
>> I would like to know what is my version of TCP/IP. 4.0 ? 4.1 or 4.2 ?
>
>If you have Warp 3 your TCP/IP version is a subset of 2.0.
>If you have Warp Connect your TCP/IP version is 3.0.
>If you have Warp 4 your TCP/IP version is 4.0.
>If you have installed the TCP/IP 4.1 package the version is ...
>
>You have applied MPTS FixPak WR?8610, so your TCP/IP *stack* is at 4.2.
>For the TCP/IP *services* one of the above four lines is valid. If you
>have Warp Connect you may upgrade to TCP/IP services 4.0. I have just
>seen new CSD for 3.1/4.0. I have to check it first and then I will add
>the information to the TCP/IP section of my site.
>
>Package = MPTS (including stack) + services. Both components are serviced
>separately (FixPak and Corrective Service Diskettes).


Here's inetver from my system (org 4.1) with all fixpaks + a fix from
testcase:

Version numbers of TCP/IP protocol drivers:
   SOCKETS.SYS: 6.2002
   AFOS2.SYS:   6.2000
   AFINET.SYS:  6.2007

>   /Olli/
>--
>IBM OS/2 Warp Update Summary:
>http://www.warpupdates.de/english/warpupdates.html

Michael K Greene <mgreene@exis.net>     |      OS/2 Warp / Linux / Win95-311



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Exis Net Inc (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: sma.spam-not@rtd.com                              06-Dec-99 06:01:27
  To: All                                               06-Dec-99 03:38:15
Subj: Re: Networking a HP LaserJet4...

From: James Moe <sma.spam-not@rtd.com>


Kelvin Tsang wrote:
> 
> Why ?  The JetAdmin for OS/2 is comes with the JetDirect.
> Or you may find it easily at HP's homepage :
> http://www.hp.com/cposupport/prodhome/hpjetadmin1877.html

  Yes. The filename is JA105EN.EXE. Seems to be a good release; it
solved the "duplicate print of the first job" problem I had with it, and
generally seems to run faster.
  The installation is crude. Follow the the README instructiosn
slavishly and you'll do OK.

-- 

sma at rtd dot com
Remove ".spam-not" for email

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Sohnen-Moe Associates, Inc (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jknott@ibm.net                                    05-Dec-99 10:12:09
  To: All                                               06-Dec-99 11:08:23
Subj: Re: Remote Access to OS/2 (eg. MS NetMeeting)

From: jknott@ibm.net (James Knott)

In article <384532d0$1$vina$mr2ice@news.msu.ru>,
"Ivan Adzhubei" <ivan@protein.bio.msu.su> wrote:

>However, there is an absolutely wonderful little utility providing full
>remote access to OS/2 desktop from _any_ computer with Java-enabled
>browser installed. It is called Desktop On-Call, produced by IBM Japan
>software unit. You can buy it on-line  via IBM Direct, it's only about $40
>and worth each penny of this price. I use it to control my main server
>from home and even from abroad. Also, there's WinNT version available to
>control WinNT desktop in the same way. Nice feature of DToC is that it
>runs over a standard HTTP protocol, so you can easily access your remote
>machine from behind a NAT firewall, HTTP proxy, SOCKS proxy or whatever.
>It is also pretty secure (uses MD5 security I beleive).

There is also now a Linux version.


-- 
E-mail jknott@ca.ibm.com
_________________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & Ne
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: service@fromhungary.com                           06-Dec-99 16:25:14
  To: All                                               06-Dec-99 14:17:05
Subj: a good show  9228

From: service@fromhungary.com

!!!! LIVE FROM BUDAPEST !!!!
THE  HOTTEST  SHOW  LIVE  FROM  HUNGARY BUDAPEST
http://www.sex-excess.com

FREE PICS +++ FREE PICS +++ FREE PICS +++ FREE PICS 

Join our new site with a great FREE Picture Gallery

FREE PICS +++ FREE PICS +++ FREE PICS +++ FREE PICS++++


http://www.sex-excess.com


Special ++ HOT COUPLES ++ sweet LESBIAN Girls ++ ..........

http://www.sex-excess.com ++ http://www.sex-excess.com ++
http://www.sex-excess.com

kefgwdyexesfsyvotusbiisnqmkmcquurfeyzfrf

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: EuroWeb Hungary http://www.euroweb.hu (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: engel003@mc.duke.edu                              06-Dec-99 13:38:13
  To: ivan@protein.bio.msu.su                           06-Dec-99 19:57:15
Subj: Desktop on Command v. 3.0 on the way?

To: ivan@protein.bio.msu.su
From: "L. Engelhart" <engel003@mc.duke.edu>

Does anybody have any information about when DToC v. 3.0 might be available? 
I
poked around the IBM Japan site but didn't see any reference at all to a newer
version than v. 2.5.


Ivan Adzhubei wrote:

> I heard v.3.0 is already out, but only in Japanese. Maybe these bugs were
> already fixed? Anyway, they are only minor ones, and DToC is a great
product.
>
> BTW, DToC also works fine with WSeb (Aurora). Neither NetOp nor PM2You does,
> both trap the system here.
>
>
> >Ivan Adzhubei <ivan@protein.bio.msu.su> wrote in message
> >news:384532d0$1$vina$mr2ice@news.msu.ru...

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Duke University, Durham, NC, USA (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ajglass@cpcug.org                                 06-Dec-99 19:09:11
  To: All                                               06-Dec-99 19:57:15
Subj: Re: DSL Not Always On

From: ajglass@cpcug.org (Andrew J. Glass)

In message <384732B3.653FDAB2@ATTGlobal.net> - "Walter S. Rue"
<wsrue@ATTGlobal.net> writes:
:>
:>Maybe I was imagining it, but I was sure that the BellAtlantic rep I
:>spoke with about their DSL service said that OS/2 was supported.  In the
:>install kit they sent, the CD with only Win software on it was the first
:>ominous sign, then the instruction booklets with only Win related
:>instructions in it, finally the voiced denial by their reps when I
:>phoned back to confirm.  
:>
:>They require a special signon after the TCP/IP (DHCP) connection using
:>proprietary software from IVasion named PoET, to be repeated at the
:>beginning of each session (even though the line is non-switched). 
:>IVasion products are exclusively Win9x & NT.  No static IP options.  So
:>much for "always on".
:>
:>Might this signon after all be a standardized process available in the
:>likes of InJoy?  Has anyone else worked around a similar problem?

I've been using DSL from Bell Atlantic for about a year under OS/2 without any
problems. Occasionally, after non-use, it times out; running "setup.exe"
restores it.

All that's involved, really, is a unique ethernet address (which serves as the
"passoword") and the various TCP/IP settings. There are no device drivers. So
the DSL terminal doesn't care what OS is under the hood. I'm running at 1MB,
by the way, with typical thruputs of 80 Mbs.

Of, course, BA won't do this for you; their technies were sufficiently
challenged by Windows NT.


- Andy

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Capital PC Users Group (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: oliver.rick@oor.de                                05-Dec-99 22:44:23
  To: All                                               06-Dec-99 21:20:29
Subj: Re: Version of TCP/IP

From: oliver.rick@oor.de (Oliver Rick)

On Sat, 04 Dec 1999 Lorne Sunley wrote:

> There is a page at http://www.warpupdates.de which
> seems to have a fairly coherent description of the
> versions and updates (which is an amazing thing
> given the Tower of Babel that surrounds the nomenclature
> for MPTS and TCP/IP versions and updates)

Thanks.
And IBM keeps me busy. I spend the whole afternoon equalizing the new
FixPak (no longer Corrective Service Diskettes) for TCP/IP 3.1 and 4.0
services. The correlation with MPTS 5.4 (WR*8610) makes it even more
confusing.
Poor user of Warp Connect who hasn't the TCP/IP 4.1 package and wants
to upgrade to the latest TCP/IP stack and services. |-}

   /Olli/
--
IBM OS/2 Warp Update Summary:
http://www.warpupdates.de/english/warpupdates.html

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Out of Rosenheim/2 (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: withjnaye@integrityonline.com                     06-Dec-99 16:19:17
  To: All                                               06-Dec-99 21:20:29
Subj: Help... deleted TCP/IP Startup from Startup folder

From: Jay Withee <withjnaye@integrityonline.com>

I was trying to get rid of a second-rate file mgr I shadowed to the
startup folder, but a few mouse-miscues later and I had deleted the
aforementioned folder. I didn't have the Desktop set to archive at a sys
startup (dumb mistake), so I don't know how to recover the folder.

Any help appreciated,

Jay

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Verio (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jim.danvers@mindex.com                            06-Dec-99 22:03:07
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 12:14:17
Subj: Re: Networking a HP LaserJet4...

From: Jim Danvers <jim.danvers@mindex.com>

I don't really know a ton about OS/2 (matter 'o fact I don't hardly know
anything about it!), but I have recently installed it on a box @work and
have been playing  / experimenting with it for the last couple of
days....   Anyhow - with respect to your JetAdmin s/w question - I have
heard of many a bad experience with jetadmin in the NT world also (which
is what I deal with @work) - my solution is to use a protocol called
"DLC" to talk to the jetdirect devices that we have on our network.  It
will ~only~ work with jetdirect devices though (w/respect to using it as
a printing protocol).  Bear in mind that DLC is non-routable, so if you
need to access a printer on the other side of a router it ain't gonna
work for you.  I dunno if OS/2 has an equivilent to DLC, but thats my
.02 cents worth anyway.  Hope its good for something....  {shrug
shoulders}

-=- J.D. -=-


Mark Mellin wrote:

> Any ideas on how to connect/configure Warp4 as the print server on
> a HP LaserJet4 using HP's JetDirect card across a 10-BaseT peer
> network with TCP/IP ??
>
> I couldn't & didn't find any JetDirect software for OS/2 on HP's
> or IBM's driver site(s).
>
> My telenet'd config for the Jetdirect card is as follows:
>
> ===JetDirect Telnet Configuration===
>
>         Configured Parameters
>         IP Address      : 192.168.1.5
>         Subnet Mask     : 255.255.255.0
>         Default Gateway : 192.168.1.5
>         Syslog Server   : 192.168.1.1
>         Idle Timeout    : 90 Seconds
>
> Everything seems to be connected and working properly...
>
> Thanks in advance for any help.
> Mark

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au                    07-Dec-99 01:34:14
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 12:14:17
Subj: Re: Help... deleted TCP/IP Startup from Startup folder

From: peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (Peter Moylan)

Jay Withee <withjnaye@integrityonline.com> wrote:
>I was trying to get rid of a second-rate file mgr I shadowed to the
>startup folder, but a few mouse-miscues later and I had deleted the
>aforementioned folder. I didn't have the Desktop set to archive at a sys
>startup (dumb mistake), so I don't know how to recover the folder.

Just create a new program object that runs TCPSTART.CMD.

-- 
Peter Moylan                                         peter@ee.newcastle.edu.au
See http://eepjm.newcastle.edu.au for OS/2 information and software

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: The University of Newcastle (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: starose@pyramid.net                               06-Dec-99 19:14:12
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 12:14:18
Subj: warp4\win98 network success

From: "Steve Rose" <starose@pyramid.net>

UPDATE

I did a complete reinstall, then went on the web and installed Fixpack 12.
Then I let MPTN do most of the work and...voila!
Still not able to surf the web on the os2 box, but I can use the windows
machine and download directly to the os2 hard drive.
By the way, the os2box is now all HPFS and the Win98box is running FAT32.
I have full access to the floppy,CD,zip,printer and hard drives on the
winbox from OS\2 and access to the OS\2 hard drives from Windows,
Thanx for all the suggestions.
Steve


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: mail@ridax.se                                     07-Dec-99 08:57:07
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 12:14:19
Subj: Re: Remote Access to OS/2 (eg. MS NetMeeting)

From: mail@ridax.se (Mikael Wahlgren)

:>browser. Just type in an URL and voila - it works. Another nice feature is
:>that the service is run via standard HTTP protocol, guaranteed to be routed
:>across _any_ proper network setup: NAT firelwall, proxy, SOCKS, etc. This is
:>usually not true for other similar packages (like NetOp or PM2You).

This is not true.  PM2You also has a Java client, that makes it possible for
you to remotely control the OS/2 desktop from an ordinary Java enabled browser
(like Netscape or IE).  If you use this Java client, you can select to use the
standard HTTP protocol, making it completely HTTP compliant.

I am not sure if you have understood the real problem with proxy and
firewalls.  The most common problem (according to my experience) in this case,
is that the HOST (the machine you want to control) is behind a firewall, and
THAT is not solved simply by complying to the HTTP protocol, and I think most
security admins are happy with that, otherwise the firewall would be rather
meaningless.

Mikael Wahlgren - mail@ridax.se
Ridax programutveckling - PM2You/OS2You Remote Control for OS/2
http://ridax.nu
WIN2You - Remote Control for Windows 95/NT

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Ridax programutveckling (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: hellwig@exp.bessy.de                              07-Dec-99 11:21:19
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 12:14:19
Subj: different TCP/IP configuration

From: Chris Hellwig <hellwig@exp.bessy.de>

Hi,

I have an OS/2 client working in different lan's.
So I have to change the settings like 
- IP address and name
- router
. DNS
- ....

Is there a way to save the settings from tcpcfg in different files, to
have at the end some icons like  STAY_at_place_A, STAY_at_place_B,
STAY_at_place_C & .....

Bye
  Chris

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: esimon@ifu.net                                    07-Dec-99 04:45:10
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 12:14:19
Subj: Re: warp 3.0

From: "edsimon" <esimon@ifu.net>

Thanks for the suggestions.

I really did not want to spend any more money on a new os package.
I like os2 warp 3.0 and just wanted to connect it to my small home lan.


edsimon wrote in message ...
>is this program any good.  can I use it to network?  can I run apache
>webserver on warp 3.0?  I don't want to spend any money on upgrading it to
>warp 4.
>
>thanks
>esimon
>
>


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: esimon@ifu.net                                    07-Dec-99 04:45:20
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 12:14:19
Subj: Re: warp 3.0

From: "edsimon" <esimon@ifu.net>

edsimon wrote in message ...
>is this program any good.  can I use it to network?  can I run apache
>webserver on warp 3.0?  I don't want to spend any money on upgrading it to
>warp 4.
>
>thanks
>esimon
>
>


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: donnelly@tampabay.rr.com                          07-Dec-99 14:18:09
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 16:53:18
Subj: Re: Help... deleted TCP/IP Startup from Startup folder

From: donnelly@tampabay.rr.com (Buddy Donnelly)

On Mon, 6 Dec 1999 21:19:34, Jay Withee 
<withjnaye@integrityonline.com> wrote:

> I was trying to get rid of a second-rate file mgr I shadowed to the
> startup folder, but a few mouse-miscues later and I had deleted the
> aforementioned folder. I didn't have the Desktop set to archive at a sys
> startup (dumb mistake), so I don't know how to recover the folder.

Henk Kelder's CHECKINI will find entries in the INI files and attempt 
to recreate missing folders and the objects that were in them. It 
works extremely well. Download the WPTOOLS package at:

	http://www.os2ss.com/information/kelder/
-- 

Good luck,

Buddy

Buddy Donnelly
donnelly@tampabay.rr.com


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: RoadRunner - TampaBay (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: noone@llondel.demon.co.uk                         07-Dec-99 09:18:06
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 16:53:18
Subj: Re: Networking a HP LaserJet4...

From: "Dave {Reply Address in.sig}" <noone@llondel.demon.co.uk>

On Mon, 06 Dec 1999 00:47:43 GMT, Mark Mellin wrote:

>Any ideas on how to connect/configure Warp4 as the print server on
>a HP LaserJet4 using HP's JetDirect card across a 10-BaseT peer
>network with TCP/IP ??
>
>I couldn't & didn't find any JetDirect software for OS/2 on HP's
>or IBM's driver site(s).
>
It's hidden in with the JetAdmin stuff. JA105EN.EXE or something like
that, IIRC. Works fine here, I've got a LaserJet4M+ which will talk to
OS/2 machines, a Windoze95 machine (when it's switched on) and a Mac,
all on the same network.

As an aside, did anyone notice that HP have discontinued decent
JetAdmin support for OS/2 - you have to have an NT server on your
system to run the newer OS/2 JetAdmin. I couldn't find a suitable HP
contact to complain to in the notifying email :-( Not that I use it
anyway...

 
Dave
-- 
mail da ve@llondel.demon.co.uk
http://www.llondel.demon.co.uk
Give blood... Play Rugby!


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: the bus stop (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ktkelvin@yahoo.com                                08-Dec-99 00:45:26
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 16:53:18
Subj: Re: Networking a HP LaserJet4...

From: "Kelvin Tsang" <ktkelvin@yahoo.com>

Dave {Reply Address in.sig} <noone@llondel.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:abbaryybaqryqrzbapbhx.fmdjqds.pminews@sharra.llondel.demon.co.uk...
> On Mon, 06 Dec 1999 00:47:43 GMT, Mark Mellin wrote:
>
> As an aside, did anyone notice that HP have discontinued decent
> JetAdmin support for OS/2 -
> you have to have an NT server on your system to run
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Dave, what do you mean ?
Is that mean the new JetAdmin/2 will detect the existence
of NT Server to work ?

I'm using the bundled OS/2 driver of JetDirect 500x, and
am planning to upgrade to the lastest one, if any.

Kelvin



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Still an OS/2 fan ! (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: klcroxen@fas.harvard.edu                          07-Dec-99 15:07:13
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 16:53:18
Subj: Re: warp4\win98 network success

From: klcroxen@fas.harvard.edu (Kevin Croxen)

Sorry to come to the thread late, but try a small proxy server on 
the machine connected to the 'net to provide web access for the 
other. Internet Gate on bmt micro's site works very well for this 
purpose; other folks like wingate or Trumpet firesock for this 
purpose when the net connection is on the Windows box.

--Kevin



On Mon, 6 Dec 1999 19:14:24 -0800, Steve Rose <starose@pyramid.net> wrote:
>UPDATE
>
>I did a complete reinstall, then went on the web and installed Fixpack 12.
>Then I let MPTN do most of the work and...voila!
>Still not able to surf the web on the os2 box, but I can use the windows
>machine and download directly to the os2 hard drive.
>By the way, the os2box is now all HPFS and the Win98box is running FAT32.
>I have full access to the floppy,CD,zip,printer and hard drives on the
>winbox from OS\2 and access to the OS\2 hard drives from Windows,
>Thanx for all the suggestions.
>Steve
>
>

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ivask@gaia.gi.ee                                  07-Dec-99 17:36:01
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 16:53:18
Subj: Re: warp 3.0

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCri?= Ivask <ivask@gaia.gi.ee>

edsimon wrote:

> is this program any good.  can I use it to network?  can I run apache
> webserver on warp 3.0?  I don't want to spend any money on upgrading it to
> warp 4.
>
> thanks
> esimon

I write:
There are some options.
Check:
http://huizen.dds.nl/~jacco2/samba/

Regards
Jri Ivask
ivask@gi.ee

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Institute of Geology at Tallinn Technical Univers
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: alex@eddie.cis.uoguelph.ca                        07-Dec-99 15:43:05
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 16:53:18
Subj: Re: warp 3.0

From: alex@eddie.cis.uoguelph.ca (Alex Taylor)

On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 04:45:20 -0500, edsimon <esimon@ifu.net> wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions.
> 
> I really did not want to spend any more money on a new os package.
> I like os2 warp 3.0 and just wanted to connect it to my small home lan.
 
Have a look at http://hobbes.nmsu.edu/pub/os2/util/network/tcpip
and look for "freetcp.zip".  That may do what you want, or some of it.
I have not tried this package myself.
 
> edsimon wrote in message ...
> >is this program any good.  can I use it to network?  can I run apache
> >webserver on warp 3.0?  I don't want to spend any money on upgrading it to
> >warp 4.
> >
> >thanks
> >esimon


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 Alex Taylor                  BA - CIS - University of Guelph
 alex@eddie.cis.uoguelph.ca   http://eddie.cis.uoguelph.ca/~alex
-----------------------------------------------------------------

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: @Home Network Canada (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jimburke@ionet.net                                07-Dec-99 15:59:19
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 16:53:18
Subj: Re: help with win98/warp4  ethernet please

From: jimburke@ionet.net (Jim Burke)

Either that or you haven't logged in.
try 
net view 
from the command line

That will start the requester and bring up the login screen. You should just
see
user and password there.

Also open the connections icon, then the network, then network services and
finally
you have the shared resources -- here is where you can add shares anduser etc.

Sounds like you're almost there.

"Steve Rose" <starose@pyramid.net> wrote:


>Steve Rose <starose@pyramid.net> wrote in message
>news:Q3R14.2026$8H.12927@newsfeed.slurp.net...
>>I dont get any sharing options on any right clicks except on my windows
>machine
>Does this mean I don;t have File and orint sharing installed?
>>
>>




--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: ioNET Inc. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: karlbeem@mindspring.com                           07-Dec-99 18:59:12
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 16:53:19
Subj: Re: Desktop on Command v. 3.0 on the way?

From: "Karl M. Beem" <karlbeem@mindspring.com>

On Mon, 06 Dec 1999 13:38:26 -0500, L. Engelhart wrote:

>Does anybody have any information about when DToC v. 3.0 might be available?  
I
>poked around the IBM Japan site but didn't see any reference at all to a
newer
>version than v. 2.5.

I doubt if it exists.  2.5 just came out.

Karl



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: MediaOne - Atlanta (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: kentuckybob@att.net                               07-Dec-99 19:54:25
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 21:27:02
Subj: Warp 3 TCP/IP on a 386????

From: kentuckybob@att.net

I've had some recent correspondance with a person who has come into
possession of an old IBM 730 (which he says is a 386???) with Warp 3
installed.  He says that ppp.exe is in the TCPIP/bin directory, but that
the ppp box is greyed out on the DOIP settings page.  I have no idea what
fixpack is on the machine.  Is there a minimum fp level to use PPP?  Will
this even connect on a 386?

The modem is a USR 33.6 and appears to dial into and try to log onto his
provider.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Bob
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------

Robert Underwood - kentuckybob@att.net
-----------------------------------------------------------

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: AT&T WorldNet Services (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: myself@pbn.dp.ua                                  07-Dec-99 20:58:21
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 22:22:15
Subj: 16 <-> 32

From: Ivan Klimenko <myself@pbn.dp.ua>

Hi !

	I need develop some 16-bit app (.DLL). This app should work
over standart IBM TCPIP (current version is 32-bit). Can somebody help
me ? May be some link or code-sample ?
I try use Watcom C 10.6 and MSC 6.0 (Anybody can teach me write DLL 
using MSC 6.0 (16-bit) ?)
-- 

Ivan Klimenko   [Team OS/2]
e-mail:         myself@pbn.dp.ua
net-mail:       2:464/69.11@fidonet, 2:464/27.26@fidonet
ccmail:         Ivan Klimenko at Privat-Nikopol

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: PrivatBank, Nikopol Branch (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: oliver.rick@oor.de                                06-Dec-99 22:41:19
  To: All                                               07-Dec-99 22:22:16
Subj: Re: Version of TCP/IP

From: oliver.rick@oor.de (Oliver Rick)

On Sun, 05 Dec 1999 Michael K Greene wrote:

>>> I would like to know what is my version of TCP/IP. 4.0 ? 4.1 or 4.2 ?

> Here's inetver from my system (org 4.1) with all fixpaks + a fix from
> testcase:

> Version numbers of TCP/IP protocol drivers:
>    SOCKETS.SYS: 6.2002
>    AFOS2.SYS:   6.2000
>    AFINET.SYS:  6.2007

You have a TCP/IP 4.21 *stack* with TCP/IP 4.1 *services*.

   /Olli/
--
IBM OS/2 Warp Update Summary:
http://www.warpupdates.de/english/warpupdates.html

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Out of Rosenheim/2 (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au                    08-Dec-99 02:41:15
  To: All                                               08-Dec-99 03:27:26
Subj: Re: Warp 3 TCP/IP on a 386????

From: peter@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (Peter Moylan)

kentuckybob@att.net <kentuckybob@att.net> wrote:
>I've had some recent correspondance with a person who has come into
>possession of an old IBM 730 (which he says is a 386???) with Warp 3
>installed.  He says that ppp.exe is in the TCPIP/bin directory, but that
>the ppp box is greyed out on the DOIP settings page.  I have no idea what
>fixpack is on the machine.  Is there a minimum fp level to use PPP?  Will
>this even connect on a 386?

I remember this problem. The solution used to be easy: click on
"Retrieve software updates" and get a new copy of DOIP.  (Well, that
was the theory.  In practice "Retrieve software updates" didn't work
unless your dialler was working ... but you could do the job anyway
by using your free initial subscription to Advantis.)  The original
DOIP had ppp support missing.

Since then "Retrieve software updates" moved to another server, which
possibly doesn't even exist now that Warp 3 is so old.  The principle
remains the same, though: find a newer version of DOIP.

-- 
Peter Moylan                                         peter@ee.newcastle.edu.au
See http://eepjm.newcastle.edu.au for OS/2 information and software

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: The University of Newcastle (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: stefan.hoenes-remove-@rwg.de                      07-Dec-99 21:34:13
  To: All                                               08-Dec-99 03:27:26
Subj: Are there any programs like fuser or lsof for OS/2

From: Stefan Hoenes <stefan.hoenes-remove-@rwg.de>

I had the problem, that on a computer with a ftp- and a DB2/2 client,
after a while of making connection to his servers, there are a growing
number of upd sockets which are listening to the net.

My question is:  Which process creates this udp sockets.

I have heard about the programs fuser or lsof, which could answer this
question, but only on unix systems.

Does anybody knows such programs for OS/2 or maybe there is another way
to get the information about the creator of the sockets.

mfg Stefan Hoenes

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: RWG GmbH,  Stuttgart, Germany, Europe (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: peterpan@mail2.dgraph.com                         08-Dec-99 00:23:25
  To: All                                               08-Dec-99 05:09:28
Subj: Re: Warp 3 TCP/IP on a 386????

From: Fujiha <peterpan@mail2.dgraph.com>

Peter Moylan wrote:
> 
> kentuckybob@att.net <kentuckybob@att.net> wrote:
> >I've had some recent correspondance with a person who has come into
> >possession of an old IBM 730 (which he says is a 386???) with Warp 3
> >installed.  He says that ppp.exe is in the TCPIP/bin directory, but that
> >the ppp box is greyed out on the DOIP settings page.  I have no idea what
> >fixpack is on the machine.  Is there a minimum fp level to use PPP?  Will
> >this even connect on a 386?
> 
> I remember this problem. The solution used to be easy: click on
> "Retrieve software updates" and get a new copy of DOIP.  (Well, that
> was the theory.  In practice "Retrieve software updates" didn't work
> unless your dialler was working ... but you could do the job anyway
> by using your free initial subscription to Advantis.)  The original
> DOIP had ppp support missing.
> 
> Since then "Retrieve software updates" moved to another server, which
> possibly doesn't even exist now that Warp 3 is so old.  The principle
> remains the same, though: find a newer version of DOIP.
> 

Actually a newer version of slippm (exe, dll, etc) would do

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Dreamland (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ivan@protein.bio.msu.su                           08-Dec-99 12:45:19
  To: All                                               08-Dec-99 10:20:01
Subj: Re: Desktop on Command v. 3.0 on the way?

From: "Ivan Adzhubei" <ivan@protein.bio.msu.su>

In <xneyorrzzvaqfcevatpbz.fmdwrn0.pminews@nntp.atl.mediaone.net>, on
12/07/99 
   at 06:59 PM, "Karl M. Beem" <karlbeem@mindspring.com> said:

>On Mon, 06 Dec 1999 13:38:26 -0500, L. Engelhart wrote:

>>Does anybody have any information about when DToC v. 3.0 might be available? 
 I
>>poked around the IBM Japan site but didn't see any reference at all to a
newer
>>version than v. 2.5.

>I doubt if it exists.  2.5 just came out.

I heard about v.3.0 (Japanese) on this newsgroup some time ago. A search
on dejanews should help to locate that posting. A person reported he has
downloaded it but asked for help with installing/configuring since the
config notebook layout has changed significantly from v.2.5 and he was not
able to match Japanese-labeled entries in the new notebook to previous
English v.2.5. I have no other information about v.3.0, sorry.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Ivan Adzhubei" <ivan@protein.bio.msu.su>
-----------------------------------------------------------

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Moscow State University (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ivan@protein.bio.msu.su                           08-Dec-99 13:55:05
  To: All                                               08-Dec-99 10:20:01
Subj: Re: Desktop on Command v. 3.0 on the way?

From: "Ivan Adzhubei" <ivan@protein.bio.msu.su>

In <384e29dd$1$vina$mr2ice@news.msu.ru>, on 12/08/99 
   at 12:45 PM, "Ivan Adzhubei" <ivan@protein.bio.msu.su> said:

>>I doubt if it exists.  2.5 just came out.

>I heard about v.3.0 (Japanese) on this newsgroup some time ago. A search
>on dejanews should help to locate that posting. A person reported he has
>downloaded it but asked for help with installing/configuring since the
>config notebook layout has changed significantly from v.2.5 and he was
>not able to match Japanese-labeled entries in the new notebook to
>previous English v.2.5. I have no other information about v.3.0, sorry.

Correction: After checking with dejanews, it appears that the posting I
had on my mind actually referred to DToC v.2.5. So, no any new version...

Sorry for a confusion.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Ivan Adzhubei" <ivan@protein.bio.msu.su>
-----------------------------------------------------------

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Moscow State University (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jknott@ibm.net                                    08-Dec-99 05:50:27
  To: All                                               08-Dec-99 10:20:01
Subj: Re: different TCP/IP configuration

From: jknott@ibm.net (James Knott)

In article <384CDFB3.DB3BE0F@exp.bessy.de>,
Chris Hellwig <hellwig@exp.bessy.de> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have an OS/2 client working in different lan's.
>So I have to change the settings like 
>- IP address and name
>- router
>. DNS
>- ....
>
>Is there a way to save the settings from tcpcfg in different files, to
>have at the end some icons like  STAY_at_place_A, STAY_at_place_B,
>STAY_at_place_C & .....

The IP address and router info is stored in \mptn\bin\setup.cmd.  The 
DNS info is stored in \mptn\etc\resolv2.  To use different OS/2 at 
different sites, just replace these files.  I have my computer 
configured to select location at bootup.  I change the setup.cmd file,
lan logon commands and network drivers, but not resolve file.

-- 
E-mail jknott@ca.ibm.com
_________________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & Ne
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jknott@ibm.net                                    08-Dec-99 06:00:17
  To: All                                               08-Dec-99 10:20:01
Subj: Re: SYS1719 with NETWKSTA.200

From: jknott@ibm.net (James Knott)

In article <38485D76.D493BC6B@spam-not.rtd.com>,
James Moe <sma@spam-not.rtd.com> wrote:
>Installing netbios-over-tcpip is only a prerequisite for
>peer network. If you are not running peer networking, you can delete
>that line.

NetBIOS/IP is used to access *ANY* NetBIOS resource i.e. peer or 
client server, via an IP only network.  If all the computers are on 
one side of a router, NetBIOS/IP is not needed.

-- 
E-mail jknott@ca.ibm.com
_________________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & Ne
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@b...               08-Dec-99 15:12:08
  To: All                                               08-Dec-99 14:48:04
Subj: Re: SYS1719 with NETWKSTA.200

Message sender: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@bromo.email.ch

From: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@bromo.email.ch (Jens)

Huuu...this is weired: after removing the mouse from config.sys (com2,
irq3), NETWKSTA.200 loads now !!

Jens

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: JMS Consulting (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: piquant00@uswestmail.net                          08-Dec-99 15:12:11
  To: All                                               08-Dec-99 14:48:04
Subj: Re: Warp 3 TCP/IP on a 386????

From: piquant00@uswestmail.net (Annie K.)

On Wed, 8 Dec 1999 00:54:51, kentuckybob@att.net wrote:

:He says that ppp.exe is in the TCPIP/bin directory, but that
:the ppp box is greyed out on the DOIP settings page. 

 He needs to properly install ftp://ftp.ibm.net/pub/PPP/PPP.ZIP

-- 
Klaatu barada nikto

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Team OS/2 (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jspringf@xxxpro-ns.net                            08-Dec-99 19:26:07
  To: All                                               08-Dec-99 19:54:20
Subj: UltiMail and tcpip v4.1/4.2

From: jspringf@xxxpro-ns.net

Has anyone been able to get UML working properly with the 32 bit stacks?

When I try, it works fine with my dial-up ISP connection after I have
connected, and just use it on-line.  The problem shows up in off-line
operation.

When I compose letters off-line, they get sent to the deadlet.ter
file instead of going to the \mptn\etc\mqueue directory, to await
processing by sendmail when the next dial-up connection is made.

I can't figure out if it is a basic incompatibility between UML and the
new stacks (wr08600, wr08610, wr08620), or I just don't have the
right setup/configuration.

There is another oddity with the 32 bit stacks, and that is the dialog
box when you start it up.  The dialog box in the 16 bit stacks (from
linkup.exe) asks if you want to Connect or Don't Connect.  With the
32 bit stacks, the choice is Connect(to an ISP) or Connect to a LAN,
and since I want to be off-line, I choose Connect to a LAN, even though
I have no LAN, but just a single workstation (which happens to be
connected to another workstation by IBM Peer).  But, even if I shut
the other workstation down, it still sends the letters which are composed
off-line to the deadlet.ter file.

For the time being I have removed tcpip v4.1 from my system, but
would like to put it back with a fully working UML.

So--any ideas anyone?

-----------------------------------------------------------
Fred Springfield                       for e-mail remove 'xxx'
Plymouth, MN
-----------------------------------------------------------

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Professional Network Services (pro-ns.net) (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: noone@llondel.demon.co.uk                         08-Dec-99 20:35:01
  To: All                                               08-Dec-99 19:54:20
Subj: Re: Networking a HP LaserJet4...

From: "Dave {Reply Address in.sig}" <noone@llondel.demon.co.uk>

On Wed, 8 Dec 1999 00:45:52 -0000, Kelvin Tsang wrote:

>
>Dave {Reply Address in.sig} <noone@llondel.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:abbaryybaqryqrzbapbhx.fmdjqds.pminews@sharra.llondel.demon.co.uk...
>> On Mon, 06 Dec 1999 00:47:43 GMT, Mark Mellin wrote:
>>
>> As an aside, did anyone notice that HP have discontinued decent
>> JetAdmin support for OS/2 -
>> you have to have an NT server on your system to run
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Dave, what do you mean ?
>Is that mean the new JetAdmin/2 will detect the existence
>of NT Server to work ?
>
Part of an email I received from HP, dated 11th October:

----------------------------------------------------------------
3. HP JetAdmin discontinuance notice
----------------------------------------------------------------
The simple installation tools for printer and print server installation

and HP Web JetAdmin for management, troubleshooting, and diagnostics
have 
become more powerful and simpler to use than HP JetAdmin. HP will
continue 
to invest and expand functionality with simple installation tools and
HP 
Web JetAdmin. As a result, this evolution and continual improvement
process 
allows HP to begin a discontinuance process for the HP JetAdmin family 
of software products listed below effective February 1, 2000:
 
* HP JetAdmin Version 2.7 for Microsoft Windows 3.1x 
* HP JetAdmin Version 3.4x for Microsoft Windows 95/98 
* HP JetAdmin Version 3.4x for Microsoft Windows NT
* HP JetAdmin Version D.06x for HP-UX 10x and 11x 
* HP JetAdmin Version D.06x for Sun Solaris 
* HP JetAdmin Version A.04x for IBM OS/2 

HP encourages customers to take advantage of the many benefits of HP
Web 
JetAdmin and the Simple Installation Tools by migrating to these robust

solutions at the earliest possible convenience. At the same time, HP
will 
provide full support of JetAdmin until January 31, 2002 to ensure ample

time to complete this transition. HP Web JetAdmin 5.6 is currently
available 
in English, French, Italian, German, Spanish, and Japanese. In the near

future HP will release new versions of Web JetAdmin that will also be 
available in Czech, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Simplified
Chinese 
and Traditional Chinese.

For more information on HP JetAdmin discontinuance and the extended
support 
timeline, please visit: 

     http://network-printing.com/Key=1674.M5m.D.g3aQ9

===========================================================

When I went looking for OS/2 versions of the Web JetAdmin, I discovered
from the HP website that:

>>HP Print Server Manager, along with HP Web JetAdmin, provide the
>>ability to install, configure, manage, and troubleshoot TCP/IP connected
>>devices on an intranet. For this support, HP Web JetAdmin 5.6 must be
>>installed on a Windows NT 4.0 PC (Workstation or Server) and HP Print
>>Server Manager must be installed on an OS/2 server.

(on http://www.hp.com/cposupport/networking/software/hppsosen.exe.html
)

I don't know what level of support you get without the NT machine but I
think it's bad that there isn't a native OS/2 equivalent.


Dave
-- 
mail da ve@llondel.demon.co.uk
http://www.llondel.demon.co.uk
Give blood... Play Rugby!


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: the bus stop (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: eickhsr@jm-usa.com                                08-Dec-99 15:00:15
  To: All                                               08-Dec-99 19:54:20
Subj: Injoy Firewall logging

From: Stephen Eickhoff <eickhsr@jm-usa.com>


Bjarne Jensen wrote:

> >IMHO, less people would be confused if the standard version
> >was called  "InJoy Gateway" and the professional version
> >"InJoy Firewall".
>
> Originally it was actually called the InJoy Gateway, but
> that gave a lot of confusion too. One problem was that a
> top-level name was needed to cover both versions (of the
> same program) and we didn't want two sets of docs, web and
> purchase options.
>
> > Another thing which I found very confusing is the system of
> >multiple config files (there are seven of them I believe).
> >First of all, IJF  doesn't tell you which files it reads;
>
> The documentation clarifies what files to use and even the
> comments in the top of the files tell fairly clear what they
> are used for..

But the product doesn't behave as documented. (see below)

>
> >then, if you put the commands in the wrong file, it doesn't
> >produce error messages, it simply ignores the misplaced
> >commands!
>
> That would be because your file included the information
> needed by the firewall, so the firewall doesn't read the
> rest of the file looking for displaced firewall rules.
> If you put rules into files, by random, then you are
> gonna get into problems with a lot of software though..
>

I don't have trouble with this. I usually get a .err if I do mess up.
That works pretty well.

My problem is that I have logging control = disabled on all my rules,
yet the hard drive goes constantly whenever the firewall is accessed,
and the log shows every single transaction! I suppose it's logging
everything _but_ my rules. Can't I shut ALL logging off, or just log
certain ports? This poor P90 is killing my Tribes connection ;-)

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: UUNET WorldCom server (post doesn't reflect views
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: cmhall@umich.edu                                  09-Dec-99 18:39:16
  To: All                                               09-Dec-99 15:31:04
Subj: Error 58 trying to net view Mac share (Dave OR Apple Share)

From: cmhall@umich.edu (Chris Hall)

We've got a local peer network going which works very well. I have both
netbios and netbios over tcp/ip enabled, and can view and share resources
on OS/2 and Win95 machines. However, a Mac running either Dave or
Apple Share won't even let me view what shares are available, let alone
provide a password. Error message is 58, meaning that the machine cannot
provide the requested service. Running Warp 4, FP12, Lan & Prot services at
8423, TCP/IP at 8423, Net Services and Peer at 8400, Lan Req. at 8406. Anyone
out there been successful in a peer relationship with a Mac have any ideas
for configuring things so we can at least see what's available?

Chris Hall  (cmhall@umich.edu)
Dept. of Geological Sciences, U. of Michigan
"They use Microsoft Excel to plot their data. Sometimes they get the results
they expect, sometimes they don't."   from Microsoft TV commercial, 1999.


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: starose@pyramid.net                               09-Dec-99 10:51:04
  To: All                                               09-Dec-99 22:41:11
Subj: Re: SYS1719 with NETWKSTA.200

From: "Steve Rose" <starose@pyramid.net>

James Moe <sma@spam-not.rtd.com> wrote in message
news:384ACE8A.E2CD1331@spam-not.rtd.com...
> Missed the original message but try moving the IFS line with netwksta200
to the end of config.sys. IBM says it doesn't matter what order config. sys
uses but I have found that that is not always correct. In my recent
experience I used a utility called cfgsort101, which Ive always liked for
neatness sake, but after I ran it I got all kinds of bootup errors. moving
that statement solved this.
>
> Jens wrote:
> >
> > >   Using just the tcp/ip programs? Like FTP, RSH, REXEC, TELNET?
> > >   What kind of OS's are the remote systems running? What kind of
> > > networking are they running?
> >
> > WinNT
> >
>   You _definitely_ need peer networking then. Install the
> Netbios-over-tcpip in MPTS to enable the protocol. Then (re-)install
> peer. (If you had a bad install, try uninstalling it first.)
>
> --
>
> sma at rtd dot com
> Remove "spam-not." for email


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jrosinskinews@my-deja.com                         09-Dec-99 19:49:25
  To: All                                               09-Dec-99 22:41:11
Subj: OS/2 Newbie help!!!

From: jrosinskinews@my-deja.com

Hello, got a problem with a warp3 box has stopped
accepting all tcp connections (web, telnet, http)
through the IP addresses on both NICs, even on
the local box.  HOWEVER, when connecting locally
using 127.0.0.1 I CAN connect.  Looks like a
hosed TCP stack, but I'm not sure.  The problem
started when I started getting "MPTN_NB opened ok
handle=5" and "MPTHOST IOCTL result=0" messages
when parsing some of the network lines in the
config.sys on startup.

ANY HELP PLEASE!!!


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Deja.com - Before you buy. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: cturton@btas.com.au                               09-Dec-99 21:43:01
  To: All                                               09-Dec-99 22:41:11
Subj: Logging in from OS/2 to Windows NT network

From: "Chris Turton" <cturton@btas.com.au>

Hello anyone,

I am having a problem with a voicemail server that I have that runs OS/2
warp 4. What I need to be able to do is map a drive letter on my voicemail
to a network drive on the NT server for backup purposes. This way I can use
a backup utility to backup to the TCPIP NT network. Can anyone provide any
ideas regarding this? I can't find anyone in Australia that knows how to do
this and I am running low on ideas. I would be eternally grateful for any
assistance. I have tried the " net use" command and others and no luck.

Please help!


Chris Turton
Sydney Australia
email : cturton@btas.com.au

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: OzEmail Ltd, Australia (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: donnelly@tampabay.rr.com                          09-Dec-99 21:59:05
  To: All                                               09-Dec-99 22:41:11
Subj: Re: SYS1719 with NETWKSTA.200

From: donnelly@tampabay.rr.com (Buddy Donnelly)

On Thu, 9 Dec 1999 18:51:09, "Steve Rose" <starose@pyramid.net> wrote:

> 
> James Moe <sma@spam-not.rtd.com> wrote in message
> news:384ACE8A.E2CD1331@spam-not.rtd.com...
> > Missed the original message but try moving the IFS line with netwksta200
> to the end of config.sys. IBM says it doesn't matter what order config. sys
> uses but I have found that that is not always correct. In my recent
> experience I used a utility called cfgsort101, which Ive always liked for
> neatness sake, but after I ran it I got all kinds of bootup errors. moving
> that statement solved this.

ConfigSort is up to v.2.2, and is much improved over v.1 which still 
did an amazing job of making sense out of CONFIG.SYS.

	http://www.musthave.com/files/cfgsrt22.zip

Generally, you only have to move IFS statements within their section. 
CFGSort puts them right after the BASEDEV section, which appears to 
coincide with the kernel's load order, but OS/2 loads IFS statements 
in the order they appear in CONFIG.SYS, as far as I've seen.


-- 

Good luck,

Buddy

Buddy Donnelly
donnelly@tampabay.rr.com


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: RoadRunner - TampaBay (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: sma.spam-not@rtd.com                              10-Dec-99 01:09:04
  To: All                                               09-Dec-99 22:41:11
Subj: Re: Networking a HP LaserJet4...

From: James Moe <sma.spam-not@rtd.com>


"Dave {Reply Address in.sig}" wrote:
> 
> 
> As an aside, did anyone notice that HP have discontinued decent
> JetAdmin support for OS/2 - you have to have an NT server on your
> system to run the newer OS/2 JetAdmin. I couldn't find a suitable HP
> contact to complain to in the notifying email :-( Not that I use it
> anyway...
> 
  As I recall, HP is discontinuing ALL versions of JetAdmin, not just
os/2. The replacement is WebJetAdmin.

-- 

sma at rtd dot com
Remove ".spam-not" for email

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Sohnen-Moe Associates, Inc (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ajglass@cpcug.org                                 09-Dec-99 23:29:17
  To: All                                               09-Dec-99 22:41:12
Subj: Re: different TCP/IP configuration

From: ajglass@cpcug.org (Andrew J. Glass)

Can you kindly tell me how I would go about loading the network drivers for a
(second) Ethernet card?

Can you kindly tell me whether I could load the TCP/IP info under "lan 1"? If
so, how would tell the machine whether I wanted to connect to lan 0 or lan 1?
Is it possible to be connected (at least at the DNS level) to both?

Thanks.


:>The IP address and router info is stored in \mptn\bin\setup.cmd.  The 
:>DNS info is stored in \mptn\etc\resolv2.  To use different OS/2 at 
:>different sites, just replace these files.  I have my computer 
:>configured to select location at bootup.  I change the setup.cmd file,
:>lan logon commands and network drivers, but not resolve file.
:>
:>-- 
:>E-mail jknott@ca.ibm.com
:>_________________________________________________________________________
:>The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
:>IBM Canada Ltd.



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Capital PC Users Group (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca                           10-Dec-99 00:56:27
  To: All                                               09-Dec-99 22:41:12
Subj: Re: different TCP/IP configuration

From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca (Lorne Sunley)

On Thu, 9 Dec 1999 23:29:34, ajglass@cpcug.org (Andrew J. Glass) 
wrote:

> Can you kindly tell me how I would go about loading the network drivers for
a
> (second) Ethernet card?
> 
> Can you kindly tell me whether I could load the TCP/IP info under "lan 1"?
If
> so, how would tell the machine whether I wanted to connect to lan 0 or lan
1?
> Is it possible to be connected (at least at the DNS level) to both?
> 

Just use MPTS to configure the driver for the network card
and add the TCP/IP protocol for that interface.

You can have TCP/IP bound to a maximum of 8 NIC's (I think that's
the limit anyway).

The "route" statements in the SETUP.CMD file determine which
interface is used for sending out the packets.

If you have two NIC's 

ifconfig lan0 10.1.1.1
route add net 205.200 10.1.1.1 
route add net 200.100 10.1.1.1

ifconfig lan1 10.1.2.1
route add net 168 10.1.2.1
route add net 54,1 10.1.2.1

route add default 205.200.1.1


This configuration will route packets to
any IP address in the subnet 205.200 through
the lan0 interface (they will have to connected to
the LAN the NIC is part of). It will also route
packets for any address 200.100.x.x through
lan0

The second NIC will be used to pass along
packets addressed to the sub nets 168.x.x.x
and 54.1.x.x (the machines on those sub nets 
will have to attached to the LAN the NIC is part of).

Any packets addressed to IP addresses that
are outside of the named sub net routes will
be sent to the IP address 205.200.1.1 which
will be sent out through lan0 as that NIC has
a sub net route for that IP address.

Clear as mud, right?


--

Lorne Sunley

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: MBnet Networking Inc. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: cannyk@hotmail.com                                10-Dec-99 07:56:24
  To: All                                               10-Dec-99 10:35:21
Subj: recommend

From: "Kenny" <cannyk@hotmail.com>

hi guys,
anyone know what is the easiest manage software for mail server ????
thanks for helping .

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Subscriber of Pacific Internet (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jknott@ibm.net                                    10-Dec-99 05:41:20
  To: All                                               10-Dec-99 10:35:21
Subj: Re: different TCP/IP configuration

From: jknott@ibm.net (James Knott)

In article <yXW34.96$C9.9694@news>, ajglass@cpcug.org (Andrew J. Glass) wrote:
>Can you kindly tell me how I would go about loading the network drivers for a
>(second) Ethernet card?
>
>Can you kindly tell me whether I could load the TCP/IP info under "lan 1"? If
>so, how would tell the machine whether I wanted to connect to lan 0 or lan 1?
>Is it possible to be connected (at least at the DNS level) to both?

I'm not sure what you're trying to do.  Do you want two cards enabled 
or a different card for each location?  If all you need is a second 
card, it is done in MPTS.  If you need different cards for different 
locations, you'll have to create some .CMD files that can swap files 
at bootup as required.  The files you need to swap are 
\mptn\bin\setup.cmd and \ibmlan\ibmlan.ini.  Both cards have to be in 
config.sys, unless you also want to swap or change that file.

-- 
E-mail jknott@ca.ibm.com
_________________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & Ne
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ajglass@cpcug.org                                 10-Dec-99 19:20:06
  To: All                                               10-Dec-99 20:37:00
Subj: Re: different TCP/IP configuration

From: ajglass@cpcug.org (Andrew J. Glass)

I think you've told me what I need to know.
One ethernet card goes to am ADSL device.
The other card would go to an 24/7 ISDN link to my office network, which gets
me through the firewall and gains me access to my office e-mail files and
other otherwise restricted goodies.
In NT4, I had both cards working for awhile but then IP contention errors set
in and the whole edifice crashed.

Thanks. 

In message <kjNU4odSR0CS089yn@ibm.net> - jknott@ibm.net (James Knott)Fri, 10
Dec 1999 05:41:40 -0500 writes:
:>
:>In article <yXW34.96$C9.9694@news>, ajglass@cpcug.org (Andrew J. Glass)
wrote:
:>>Can you kindly tell me how I would go about loading the network drivers for 
a
:>>(second) Ethernet card?
:>>
:>>Can you kindly tell me whether I could load the TCP/IP info under "lan 1"?
If
:>>so, how would tell the machine whether I wanted to connect to lan 0 or lan
1?
:>>Is it possible to be connected (at least at the DNS level) to both?
:>
:>I'm not sure what you're trying to do.  Do you want two cards enabled 
:>or a different card for each location?  If all you need is a second 
:>card, it is done in MPTS.  If you need different cards for different 
:>locations, you'll have to create some .CMD files that can swap files 
:>at bootup as required.  The files you need to swap are 
:>\mptn\bin\setup.cmd and \ibmlan\ibmlan.ini.  Both cards have to be in 
:>config.sys, unless you also want to swap or change that file.
:>
:>-- 
:>E-mail jknott@ca.ibm.com
:>_________________________________________________________________________
:>The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
:>IBM Canada Ltd.

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Capital PC Users Group (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: starose@pyramid.net                               10-Dec-99 12:17:02
  To: All                                               10-Dec-99 20:37:00
Subj: Re: SYS1719 with NETWKSTA.200

From: "Steve Rose" <starose@pyramid.net>

OK I downloaded the new version and tried it and I agree the format looks
much nicer,
BUT upon rebooting, Netbeui failed to load, netwksta error leading to
"system is stopped" error.
rebooting with the old config.sys, I tried moving yhe IFS line with
netwrksta to the bottom and rebooted again.
netbui and netwksta loaded this time, but once again-"system is stopped"
I think I'll just leave it unsorted, as everything works that way and if
sorting really speeds up boot times, well, I really don.t reboot very often
any way
Buddy Donnelly <donnelly@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:jORXtcYCR8l4-pn2-FLPydNKcjhh5@SPHERICALBURN.TAMPABAY.RR.COM...
> On Thu, 9 Dec 1999 18:51:09, "Steve Rose" <starose@pyramid.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > James Moe <sma@spam-not.rtd.com> wrote in message
> > news:384ACE8A.E2CD1331@spam-not.rtd.com...
> > > Missed the original message but try moving the IFS line with
netwksta200
> > to the end of config.sys. IBM says it doesn't matter what order config.
sys
> > uses but I have found that that is not always correct. In my recent
> > experience I used a utility called cfgsort101, which Ive always liked
for
> > neatness sake, but after I ran it I got all kinds of bootup errors.
moving
> > that statement solved this.
>
> ConfigSort is up to v.2.2, and is much improved over v.1 which still
> did an amazing job of making sense out of CONFIG.SYS.
>
> http://www.musthave.com/files/cfgsrt22.zip
>
> Generally, you only have to move IFS statements within their section.
> CFGSort puts them right after the BASEDEV section, which appears to
> coincide with the kernel's load order, but OS/2 loads IFS statements
> in the order they appear in CONFIG.SYS, as far as I've seen.
>
>
> --
>
> Good luck,
>
> Buddy
>
> Buddy Donnelly
> donnelly@tampabay.rr.com
>
>


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: help@98.to                                        10-Dec-99 21:09:29
  To: All                                               10-Dec-99 20:37:01
Subj: Collection of Web Cam Sites about Ladies, Animals (e.g. Africa & newbor

From: help@98.to (Camille)

Collection of Web Cam Sites about Ladies, Animals (e.g. Africa & newborn 
Panda) and Countries

Welcome to visit http://98.to/webcam

You can see the real time images on the web.

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Fortune Code (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: noone@llondel.demon.co.uk                         10-Dec-99 21:56:03
  To: All                                               10-Dec-99 20:37:01
Subj: Re: Networking a HP LaserJet4...

From: "Dave {Reply Address in.sig}" <noone@llondel.demon.co.uk>

On Fri, 10 Dec 1999 01:09:08 GMT, James Moe wrote:

>
>
>"Dave {Reply Address in.sig}" wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> As an aside, did anyone notice that HP have discontinued decent
>> JetAdmin support for OS/2 - you have to have an NT server on your
>> system to run the newer OS/2 JetAdmin. I couldn't find a suitable HP
>> contact to complain to in the notifying email :-( Not that I use it
>> anyway...
>> 
>  As I recall, HP is discontinuing ALL versions of JetAdmin, not just
>os/2. The replacement is WebJetAdmin.
>
Which is not supported in an OS/2-only version as far as I can tell,
you need the NT server stuff.

Dave
-- 
mail da ve@llondel.demon.co.uk
http://www.llondel.demon.co.uk
Give blood... Play Rugby!


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: the bus stop (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: 72764.2166@csi.com                                10-Dec-99 00:02:27
  To: All                                               10-Dec-99 21:22:22
Subj: Connecting to a Linux server

From: "Barry" <72764.2166@csi.com>

I have 2 computers networked.  Computer #1 runs Red Hat Linux 6.0,  Computer
#2 is a dual boot OS/2-WIN98 computer.  If I boot Computer #2 to WIN98 and
set it up to use either DHCP or manually entering of the IP address, I do
connect to the Linux box and see the shares.  
If I boot computer #2 to OS/2 and setup TCPIP to manually enter the IP
address, I do connect to the Linux box and see the shares.
However, If I change the TCPIP settings to automatically get IP address using
the Linux computer's DHCP server (and that is the only change I am making),
reboot, I do NOT see the Linux box.  I know the DHCP is working okay on the
OS/2 side since the DHCP monitor shows a valid lease with the correct IP
address (the same IP address that shows when I boot WIN98 using DHCP).  Of
course if I change back to manually entering the IP address, the shares then
show up.  Any ideas?

Barry
    


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: MindSpring Enterprises (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca                           10-Dec-99 05:47:00
  To: All                                               10-Dec-99 21:22:22
Subj: Re: Connecting to a Linux server

From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca (Lorne Sunley)

On Fri, 10 Dec 1999 05:02:54, "Barry" <72764.2166@csi.com> wrote:

> I have 2 computers networked.  Computer #1 runs Red Hat Linux 6.0,  Computer
> #2 is a dual boot OS/2-WIN98 computer.  If I boot Computer #2 to WIN98 and
> set it up to use either DHCP or manually entering of the IP address, I do
> connect to the Linux box and see the shares.  
> If I boot computer #2 to OS/2 and setup TCPIP to manually enter the IP
> address, I do connect to the Linux box and see the shares.
> However, If I change the TCPIP settings to automatically get IP address
using
> the Linux computer's DHCP server (and that is the only change I am making),
> reboot, I do NOT see the Linux box.  I know the DHCP is working okay on the
> OS/2 side since the DHCP monitor shows a valid lease with the correct IP
> address (the same IP address that shows when I boot WIN98 using DHCP).  Of
> course if I change back to manually entering the IP address, the shares then
> show up.  Any ideas?
> 

What version of MPTS do you have installed?

There are bugs in the earlier releases of MPTS and it's
DHCP handling. If you haven't tried it yet update the
MPTS level to WR8610.

--

Lorne Sunley

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: MBnet Networking Inc. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: donnelly@tampabay.rr.com                          10-Dec-99 23:24:16
  To: All                                               10-Dec-99 21:22:22
Subj: Re: SYS1719 with NETWKSTA.200

From: donnelly@tampabay.rr.com (Buddy Donnelly)

On Fri, 10 Dec 1999 20:17:05, "Steve Rose" <starose@pyramid.net> 
wrote:

> OK I downloaded the new version and tried it and I agree the format looks
> much nicer,
> BUT upon rebooting, Netbeui failed to load, netwksta error leading to
> "system is stopped" error.
> rebooting with the old config.sys, I tried moving yhe IFS line with
> netwrksta to the bottom and rebooted again.
> netbui and netwksta loaded this time, but once again-"system is stopped"
> I think I'll just leave it unsorted, as everything works that way and if
> sorting really speeds up boot times, well, I really don.t reboot very often
> any way

Obviously, keep a version held off to use if you sort yourself into a 
non-working CONFIG.SYS, but I'd be more suspicious of other entries 
getting sorted out of order, than the IFS lines. The Networking 
entries are the most likely, I've found, but if you want to mail me 
your working CONFIG.SYS, and the sorted non-working version, I'll see 
if anything jumps out at me. I have done extensive customization to 
CFGSORT.APP over the years, and seldom get into that kind of pickle 
anymore.



-- 

Good luck,

Buddy

Buddy Donnelly
donnelly@tampabay.rr.com


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: RoadRunner - TampaBay (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+============================================================================+
