
                   comp.os.os2.comm                 (Usenet)

                 Saturday, 16-Oct-1999 to Friday, 22-Oct-1999

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: info@BackupForDummies.com                         16-Oct-99 07:40:05
  To: All                                               16-Oct-99 05:17:17
Subj: www.BackupForDummies.com

From: info@BackupForDummies.com

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------FE202A708575834E4933A7B7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--------------FE202A708575834E4933A7B7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii; name="banner.html"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="banner.html"

<html>
<body bgcolor=white>
<!--
comp.os.os2.beta,comp.os.os2.bugs,comp.os.os2.comm,comp.os.os2.games,comp.os.os
2.mail-news -->
<center>
<b>   
Year 2000 is coming!  This diverse site is a must!
</b>
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.backupfordummies.com"><img
src="http://www.backupfordummies.com/banners/B4D.gif" border=2></a>
<br>
<br>
<b>
We apologize if this post is off topic, however we see this as
a service that is necessary for everyone!
<br>
Please direct any complaints to this post to <a
href="mailto:info@backupfordummies.com">info@backupfordummies.com</a>
</center>
<!--
comp.os.os2.beta,comp.os.os2.bugs,comp.os.os2.comm,comp.os.os2.games,comp.os.os
2.mail-news -->
</body>
</html>

--------------FE202A708575834E4933A7B7--

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: www.BackupForDummies.com (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: tvv@sbs.kiev.ua                                   16-Oct-99 12:27:04
  To: All                                               16-Oct-99 14:29:07
Subj: Re: Slow Connection

From: tvv@sbs.kiev.ua (Vit Timchishin)

On Fri, 15 Oct 1999 14:28:36, luistino <luistino@my-deja.com> wrote:

> Its like watching grass grow!
> I connect at 49.333 v.42bis, but my downloads are at 1.0k/sec. I am
> using a pentuin 120 with 32 meb. warp 4  fp 12, NS4.61 GA, Injoy 2.3.
> Modem is an IBM PCI internal 56k V90 protocol. My ISP is
> Bellatlantic.net
> 
> Injoy reports avrage rates of a round 2000 and maximums of 8000. Using
> IBM's other dialers does not result in faster access
> 
> When using native WIN 3.11 I connect at the same rate and get really
> fast responses.  Bell Atlantic's Shiva Dialer reports rates in the high
> 20,000 low 30s, and I have seen 45 or 49000 at times.
> 
> All polite suggestions gratefully received
1) Try SafeFire PPP (http://www.lgs.kiev.ua)
2) Check if you have proxy set up in Win 3.11. If so, setup same proxy in OS/2

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Navigator Online Internet News Server (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jcmcgar@net.earthlink                             16-Oct-99 21:38:11
  To: All                                               16-Oct-99 19:52:08
Subj: PCI Modems - Again!!

From: jcmcgar@net.earthlink (Chuck McGarigle)

I gave up on the USR 56K PCI modem that was supposed to work with OS/2
and picked up an Actiontec model that was advertised as OS/2 friendly.
As friendly as it was, I wasn't able to get it to dial out. The system
seemed to recognize that the modem was there, but that was about all.

I'd appreciate hearing from anyone who had success with the Actiontec 
56K PCI internal modem under OS/2. Anyone familiar with the 
installation might be able to advise me why the dos config program 
showed an IRQ of "-1" for the modem and IO port of D000. Haven't heard
from Actiontec support yet, so I'm just trying to get a head start on 
this thing before I finally throw in the hat.


Chuck McGarigle
><><><><><><><><><
jcmcgar@net.earthlink (reverse)

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: EarthLink Network, Inc. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: luistino@my-deja.com                              16-Oct-99 23:13:04
  To: All                                               16-Oct-99 21:21:02
Subj: Re: PCI Modems - Again!!

From: luistino <luistino@my-deja.com>

Chuck McGarigle wrote:
> 
> I gave up on the USR 56K PCI modem that was supposed to work with OS/2
> and picked up an Actiontec model that was advertised as OS/2 friendly.
> As friendly as it was, I wasn't able to get it to dial out. The system
> seemed to recognize that the modem was there, but that was about all.
> 
> I'd appreciate hearing from anyone who had success with the Actiontec
> 56K PCI internal modem under OS/2. Anyone familiar with the
> installation might be able to advise me why the dos config program
> showed an IRQ of "-1" for the modem and IO port of D000. Haven't heard
> from Actiontec support yet, so I'm just trying to get a head start on
> this thing before I finally throw in the hat.
> 
> Chuck McGarigle
> ><><><><><><><><><
> jcmcgar@net.earthlink (reverse)


I installed an IBM PCI modem and whilst some connection speed issues
exist, it dials and connects reliably. With the modem came software to
redirect the IRQ address, in my case to FC400. The PCI uses IRQ9 and
comm4 so my config line reads:DEVICE=E:\OS2\BOOT\COM.SYS (4,FC00,9).
The modem is very sensitive to INIT string commands and would not dial
under some of my experiments. That's all the input I can pronvide. Good
luck.

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jcmcgar@net.earthlink                             17-Oct-99 02:39:08
  To: All                                               17-Oct-99 03:47:12
Subj: Re: PCI Modems - Again!!

From: jcmcgar@net.earthlink (Chuck McGarigle)

On Sat, 16 Oct 1999 23:13:09, luistino <luistino@my-deja.com> wrote:

> Chuck McGarigle wrote:
> > 
> > I gave up on the USR 56K PCI modem that was supposed to work with OS/2
> >snip

> > Chuck McGarigle
> > ><><><><><><><><><
> > jcmcgar@net.earthlink (reverse)
> 
> 
> I installed an IBM PCI modem and whilst some connection speed issues
> exist, it dials and connects reliably. With the modem came software to
> redirect the IRQ address, in my case to FC400. The PCI uses IRQ9 and
> comm4 so my config line reads:DEVICE=E:\OS2\BOOT\COM.SYS (4,FC00,9).
> The modem is very sensitive to INIT string commands and would not dial
> under some of my experiments. That's all the input I can pronvide. Good
> luck.

If I get a chance tomorrow I'll give it a try with you config and see 
what happens. Can't be any worse than what I've already tried.

Thanks

Chuck McGarigle
><><><><><><><><><
jcmcgar@net.earthlink (reverse)



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: EarthLink Network, Inc. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: j.welton@mailcity.com                             17-Oct-99 19:20:02
  To: All                                               17-Oct-99 19:56:06
Subj: PMFax Won't Hangup Voicemail

From: j.welton@mailcity.com

I use PMFax to answer my incoming voice calls and
faxes.  I noticed recently that PMFax is not hanging
up soon after a caller leaves a voice message.  Instead
it continues to record for as long as 5 minutes and
then hangs up.  Faxes are sent and received properly.

Does anyone know why the program or modem does
not hang up soon after the caller does?

If you are using PMFax for the same purposes (voicemail
and faxing) and find PMFax hangs up soon after your
caller hangs up, would you please take a look at your
settings and compare them to mine below and let me
know how they (may) differ?  I could be missing an
entry or something special.  Thank you.

Here's my modem and PMFax property settings:

Internal Sportster Voice 33.6 Faxmodem.

PMFax Settings:

Voice: enabled is checked.
Script: CODE = 42
        OGM = H:\FAXWORKS\OGM.wav

Modem:  BPS: 14400, Speaker: Dial & Medium,
        Line Type: Tone, Dial tone, Answer 1

Modem Type:  Class 1, Receive EOP delay,
             Use HW FIFO (16550A),
             Special Command: &H2&I0&R1#VSM=130,8000



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Deja.com - Before you buy. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ddduncan@ix.netcom.com                            18-Oct-99 11:22:10
  To: All                                               18-Oct-99 16:32:02
Subj: Can't connect to certain websites with OS/2

From: David Duncan <ddduncan@ix.netcom.com>

I've been trying out a new ISP because my present one Netcom
puts a 5 MB limit on my mailbox.

Warp V4 with fix pack 10 installed and using NS 4.61 and In
Joy 2.2 have worked wonderful with Netcom with no problems. 
With my new ISP there are certain websites that I can not
connect to using NS.  Typical response from NS is "Host
contacted, waiting for reply".  My new ISP (bdis.net) has
been trying to find the cause but to no avail.

When I'm connected to my new ISP, from a command line I can
ping the websites that I have trouble with and I can trace
the hops that I'm going thru on the way to the desired web
site. 

Any one have any suggestions that I could pass along to my
ISP to solve this problem?

Thanks

Dave Duncan

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Time Warner Telecom, Inc. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: doug.bissett"at"attglobal.net                     18-Oct-99 21:11:12
  To: All                                               18-Oct-99 22:36:23
Subj: Re: PMFax Won't Hangup Voicemail

From: doug.bissett"at"attglobal.net (Doug Bissett)

On Sun, 17 Oct 1999 19:20:04, j.welton@mailcity.com wrote:

> I use PMFax to answer my incoming voice calls and
> faxes.  I noticed recently that PMFax is not hanging
> up soon after a caller leaves a voice message.  Instead
> it continues to record for as long as 5 minutes and
> then hangs up.  Faxes are sent and received properly.
> 
> Does anyone know why the program or modem does
> not hang up soon after the caller does?
> 
> If you are using PMFax for the same purposes (voicemail
> and faxing) and find PMFax hangs up soon after your
> caller hangs up, would you please take a look at your
> settings and compare them to mine below and let me
> know how they (may) differ?  I could be missing an
> entry or something special.  Thank you.
> 
> Here's my modem and PMFax property settings:
> 
> Internal Sportster Voice 33.6 Faxmodem.
> 
> PMFax Settings:
> 
> Voice: enabled is checked.
> Script: CODE = 42
>         OGM = H:\FAXWORKS\OGM.wav
> 
> Modem:  BPS: 14400, Speaker: Dial & Medium,
>         Line Type: Tone, Dial tone, Answer 1
> 
> Modem Type:  Class 1, Receive EOP delay,
>              Use HW FIFO (16550A),
>              Special Command: &H2&I0&R1#VSM=130,8000
> 
> 
> 
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.

You didn't indicate if you have the updates installed. Go to 
http://www.kellergroup.com/ and find the updates. I am pretty sure 
there is something in there about the "5 minutes to hangup" problem.

Another, possible, "fix", is to limit the record time. Go to 
Utilities-> Settings...-> Modem Voice-> and set the maximum record 
time to something shorter than 5 minutes (I use 2 minutes, but I don't
have the failure to detect a hangup either).

By the way, You just told the world your "secret" code to get into 
your saved voicemail messages, or saved FAX messages. With that code, 
and a little knowledge about PMFax, anybody can retrieve what is 
there. You should now go and change the CODE=42 entry to something 
else, and don't tell anybody what the "secret" code is.

Hope this helps...
******************************
From the PC of Doug Bissett
doug.bissett at attglobal.net
The " at " must be changed to "@"
******************************

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & Ne
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: cstumpf@monmouth.com                              19-Oct-99 14:30:26
  To: All                                               19-Oct-99 16:46:05
Subj: Re: PMFax Won't Hangup Voicemail

From: "Chris Stumpf" <cstumpf@monmouth.com>

I had this exact same problem.  The problem is the modem doesn't do proper
silence detection.  The fix is to have the phone company make a change to
your line.  It is a simple thing on their end.  They developed it when fax
machines first appeared and had the same problem of not hanging up.  It is
call either "connect on disconnect" or "instant dialtone".  You will have a
problem finding someone that knows what you mean.  The easiest thing to do is
tell them you have a fax machine that won't hang up after an incoming call
terminates.  Oh, this change/feature is free.  Good luck.


On Sun, 17 Oct 1999 19:20:04 GMT, j.welton@mailcity.com wrote:

:>I use PMFax to answer my incoming voice calls and
:>faxes.  I noticed recently that PMFax is not hanging
:>up soon after a caller leaves a voice message.  Instead
:>it continues to record for as long as 5 minutes and
:>then hangs up.  Faxes are sent and received properly.
:>
:>Does anyone know why the program or modem does
:>not hang up soon after the caller does?
:>
:>If you are using PMFax for the same purposes (voicemail
:>and faxing) and find PMFax hangs up soon after your
:>caller hangs up, would you please take a look at your
:>settings and compare them to mine below and let me
:>know how they (may) differ?  I could be missing an
:>entry or something special.  Thank you.
:>


		Chris Stumpf
		C.S.E. Computer Services
		Computer Consultant (OS/2, Lan, Wan, CTI)
		Serenity Systems Channel Partner
		IBM Certified Systems Expert - OS/2 Warp 4
		

web:    http://cse.anterras.net
email:	cse@anterras.net
phone: (732)918-2480



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Monmouth Internet (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: say@sfu.ca                                        21-Oct-99 00:07:26
  To: All                                               20-Oct-99 21:23:25
Subj: Re: Slow Connection

From: Daniel Say <say@sfu.ca>

luistino <luistino@my-deja.com> wrote:
: Its like watching grass grow!
: I connect at 49.333 v.42bis, but my downloads are at 1.0k/sec. I am
: using a pentuin 120 with 32 meb. warp 4  fp 12, NS4.61 GA, Injoy 2.3.
: Modem is an IBM PCI internal 56k V90 protocol. My ISP is
: Bellatlantic.net

: Injoy reports avrage rates of a round 2000 and maximums of 8000. Using
: IBM's other dialers does not result in faster access

: When using native WIN 3.11 I connect at the same rate and get really
: fast responses.  Bell Atlantic's Shiva Dialer reports rates in the high
: 20,000 low 30s, and I have seen 45 or 49000 at times.

: All polite suggestions gratefully received

-----------
	Text files are optimized with 56K, machine code isn't
	
	And your ISP may not have the "identical" modem protocol
	for V90 protocol.

	ATs32=32 for USR Spotster sets the X2 or Flex off, your's
	may differ.

	See if downloading a text file is faster according to 
	the up/down meters than a zipped or machinecode file.

					Daniel Say

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Simon Fraser University (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: merlin@blackpalace.com                            21-Oct-99 04:27:11
  To: All                                               21-Oct-99 03:14:02
Subj: Re: Can't connect to certain websites with OS/2

From: merlin@blackpalace.com (Merlin)

:>When I'm connected to my new ISP, from a command line I can
:>ping the websites that I have trouble with and I can trace
:>the hops that I'm going thru on the way to the desired web
:>site. 
:>
:>Any one have any suggestions that I could pass along to my
:>ISP to solve this problem?
:>

Any  possibility the block of IP addresses you log into isn't set up properly
in the reverse file?  some of the websites may have their servers set to
resolve the contacting host name and if the block is not set to reverse, or
maybe is using the "CNAME" option the server will not complete the connection?

__________________________________
merlin of OS/2 on Merlin, fp12,
  TCP/IP 4.1, Java 1.1.8
       Emtec News
   www.blackpalace.com
merlin@blackpalace.com ICQ 245937
__________________________________

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Camelot (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: bosmith@ismi.net                                  21-Oct-99 17:43:18
  To: All                                               21-Oct-99 20:06:28
Subj: Sending Binary Files via sendmail?

From: bosmith <bosmith@ismi.net>

I am running Warp v3.0 with the IBM TCPIP stack.  I use sendmail to
email text reports to users and it works quite well.  I now have a need
to send a binary file (an Excel spreadsheet) and find that sendmail
won't deliver it properly.

Can anybody suggest a way to get this done outside of manually mailing
the report?

All thoughts deeply appreciated.

Bob Smith
Univ of Michigan - Hospital Financial Services
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
bosmith@umich.edu


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: nick.grangerbrown@btinternet.com                  22-Oct-99 01:00:25
  To: All                                               22-Oct-99 05:24:03
Subj: ISDN and OS/2

From: Nicholas Granger Brown <nick.grangerbrown@btinternet.com>

I am looking for a (cheap-ish) ISDN card or External Modem to use with
BT Highway in the UK.  Does anyone have advice or experience they could
offer?  Cursory research shows very little information for OS/2 users on
the Net and most of what there is is in German.

I want to use In-Joy so the modem needs to have an AT comand set type
interface but I would prefer an internal card as I have read it is
easier to get good performance .  Alternatively an external ISDN modem
and an accelerated COM port (Capable of 400Kbit/S or more) may be a
choice but again I'd like to hear if anyone has got this to work and
how.

Will I need any other software/drivers?  Where does CFOS fit in?

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: BT Internet (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: l_luciano@da.mob                                  22-Oct-99 08:34:15
  To: All                                               22-Oct-99 10:21:21
Subj: Re: ISDN and OS/2

From: l_luciano@da.mob (Stan Goodman)

With an internal ISDN card, you will need special drivers. If you use an 
external device you will not. These all use AT command interface, and your 
dialer will not know what it is driving -- it will look like any modem. In 
addition, you will have all the advantages of external communications 
devices, e.g. LEDs that will tell you what is happening. I don't think 
there is a big spread in the prices of these things, but like with anything
else, you generally get what you pay for.

On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 16:00:50, Nicholas Granger Brown 
<nick.grangerbrown@btinternet.com> wrote:

> I am looking for a (cheap-ish) ISDN card or External Modem to use with
> BT Highway in the UK.  Does anyone have advice or experience they could
> offer?  Cursory research shows very little information for OS/2 users on
> the Net and most of what there is is in German.
> 
> I want to use In-Joy so the modem needs to have an AT comand set type
> interface but I would prefer an internal card as I have read it is
> easier to get good performance .  Alternatively an external ISDN modem
> and an accelerated COM port (Capable of 400Kbit/S or more) may be a
> choice but again I'd like to hear if anyone has got this to work and
> how.
> 
> Will I need any other software/drivers?  Where does CFOS fit in?
> 

-------------
Stan Goodman
Qiryat Tiv'on
Israel

Spammers are getting smarter; email sent to l_luciano@da.mob will not reach
me. Sorry.
Send E-mail to: domain: hashkedim dot com, username: stan.



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Verio (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: dcasey@ibm.net                                    22-Oct-99 05:49:11
  To: All                                               22-Oct-99 10:21:22
Subj: Re: ISDN and OS/2

From: dcasey@ibm.net (Dan Casey)

In article <380F38B2.E51FD173@btinternet.com>,
Nicholas Granger Brown <nick.grangerbrown@btinternet.com> wrote:
>I am looking for a (cheap-ish) ISDN card or External Modem to use with
>BT Highway in the UK.  Does anyone have advice or experience they could
>offer?  Cursory research shows very little information for OS/2 users on
>the Net and most of what there is is in German.
>
>I want to use In-Joy so the modem needs to have an AT comand set type
>interface but I would prefer an internal card as I have read it is
>easier to get good performance .  Alternatively an external ISDN modem
>and an accelerated COM port (Capable of 400Kbit/S or more) may be a
>choice but again I'd like to hear if anyone has got this to work and
>how.
>
>Will I need any other software/drivers?  Where does CFOS fit in?
>

I'm using a 3Com Impact IQ External with a Byterunner accelerated I/O
card and Injoy and it works just fine. I did download the SIO2K beta
drivers for the support they offer for the 16650 UART on the
Byterunner card.

Keep in mind that most Internal ISDN cards I've looked at require CAPI
drivers, so If your are looking at an Internal, make sure it has OS/2
CAPI drivers available for it.

I've never setup an Internal card, so I'm not sure if they respond to
AT commands, or if you can use them with Injoy.

BTW, Warpstock 99 just wrapped up, and the entire vendor area was on a
network with Internet access provided by an External ISDN TA and Injoy
and it worked flawlessly.

--
**************************************************************
*  Dan Casey                                                 *
*  President                                                 *
*  V.O.I.C.E. (Virtual OS/2 International Consumer Education *
*  http://www.os2voice.org                                   *
*  Abraxas on IRC                                            *
*  http://members.iquest.net/~dcasey                         *
*  Charter Associate member, Team SETI                       *
*  Warpstock 99 in Atlanta  http://www.warpstock.org         *
**************************************************************
*  E-Mail (subject: Req. PGP Key) for Public Key             *
**************************************************************

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: V.O.I.C.E., Indianapolis, IN (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: arcane@attglobal.net                              22-Oct-99 11:29:22
  To: All                                               22-Oct-99 10:21:22
Subj: Zoom 56K PCCARD

From: arcane@attglobal.net

 I know there has been discussion on this in the past but I'm still stuck
and hope someone can help me. I am attempting to get a 56K PCCARD modem to
work with OS/2 on an IBM Thinkpad 390. First I tried the IBM V.90 modem
but the PCMCIA s/w doesn't even assign it a COM port. Now I am trying a
Zoom 2975 and the PCMCIA regognizes it fine (COM1:) but I can't get the
IBM Dialer to talk to it. Thinking I need a driver I have looked and looked
to no avail. I believe (based on past discussions here) that it is relevant
that this one has the Lucent chip set (at least it has Lucent stuff all over
the box...). Any help ? TIA

    Jim Condon
    Arcane SOftware Consulting

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & Ne
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: klcroxen@fas.harvard.edu                          22-Oct-99 13:07:00
  To: All                                               22-Oct-99 12:35:25
Subj: Re: Zoom 56K PCCARD

From: klcroxen@fas.harvard.edu (Kevin Croxen)

Well, ZOOM claims the thing runs on DOS, so it's not a winmodem...

Just a shot in the dark, but try setting up the com port from a prompt 
with the mode command:    mode com1 115200        and see whether 
OS2 has a better time with the modem.  The machine ought to respond 
'asynchronous mode set'  If it doesn't respond at all, or produces an 
error message of some sort, then OS2 isn't seeing the com port properly 
regardless of what PCMCIA services are telling you. Thinkpads, OS2, and 
PCMCIA services in combination are generally a complete pain in the 
tookis.

Otherwise you shouldn't need a modem 'driver' (ain't no such thing) --just the 

correct init string. Zoom's documentation ought to provide it; if not, just 
open the (ahem) win95 'driver' in epm and pirate the init string out of it.

--Kevin



On 22 Oct 1999 11:29:44 GMT, arcane@attglobal.net <arcane@attglobal.net>
wrote:
> I know there has been discussion on this in the past but I'm still stuck
>and hope someone can help me. I am attempting to get a 56K PCCARD modem to
>work with OS/2 on an IBM Thinkpad 390. First I tried the IBM V.90 modem
>but the PCMCIA s/w doesn't even assign it a COM port. Now I am trying a
>Zoom 2975 and the PCMCIA regognizes it fine (COM1:) but I can't get the
>IBM Dialer to talk to it. Thinking I need a driver I have looked and looked
>to no avail. I believe (based on past discussions here) that it is relevant
>that this one has the Lucent chip set (at least it has Lucent stuff all over
>the box...). Any help ? TIA
>
>    Jim Condon
>    Arcane SOftware Consulting
>

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+============================================================================+
