
                   comp.os.os2.networking.tcp_ip    (Usenet)

                 Saturday, 25-Dec-1999 to Friday, 31-Dec-1999

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: timurkz@saxz.mmbankz.ruz                          24-Dec-99 02:22:27
  To: All                                               26-Dec-99 03:26:28
Subj: Re: syslogd from TCP/IP 4.1 with TCP/IP 4.2 stack

From: "Timur Kazimirov" <timurkz@saxz.mmbankz.ruz>

On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:44:59 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:

>Where to find documentation on this file ? There is nothing in the AIX 
>documentation and I am unable to understand russian (on www.os2.sbp.ru).

Of course, you can contact this site's author. I don't think he reject your
request.
Or, for speeding up things I can translate this article and sent one to you.

With best regards,
Timur Kazimirov

-- Remove all "z" from my address to reply



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Bank of Moscow, Sakhalin Branch (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: rajames@islandnet.com                             23-Dec-99 19:23:11
  To: All                                               26-Dec-99 03:26:29
Subj: Re: PMMail behind IPMasq? Works once, then reboot needed.

From: rajames@islandnet.com (Richard James)

In article <g35W44HwKBOU089yn@home.com>, stephen-d@home.com says...
> I have set up a home network that uses a Linux machine to do IP 
> Masquerading. The internet access is through @Home with Rogers cable in 
> Toronto.

> On the OS/2 machine I run PMMail. When I access my mail accounts 
> with @Home everything is normal for the first few times. Then, the check
> for mail run returns as though I have no mail. It connects, but no error. I 
> do have email, though!

Hmmm... weird. I ran the OS/2 version of PMMail with Shaw@home here in 
Victoria for almost a year. I used IGate (Proxy server). I had no trouble 
with the machine running IGate, but could not access mail from other 
machines on the network. When I switched (forced to) WinNT, I had the 
same problem with the Win versions of Igate and PMMail. 

About 6 weeks ago I changed to a linux box as a firewall (using the EDGE 
Router software... runs Linux and the router off a 1.8meg floppy!) Now I 
can do everything from everywhere, FTP, mail, Secure web (i.e. 
banking)etc.

Looks like a configuration problem or "something" is getting changed. One 
possibility mentioned in a reply already is check the route to the server 
(Tracert) at least it should tell you which box is causing the problem 
(one of yours or one of Rogers....

-- 
From an Island in the Pacific,
Richard James, Victoria, BC

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Richard James & Associates (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: NewsReader@NerdWorld.org                          23-Dec-99 19:26:24
  To: All                                               26-Dec-99 03:26:29
Subj: How to Tell if There is More Data at Socket

From: "Casey Bralla" <NewsReader@NerdWorld.org>

I'm writing an application in Rexx that retreives eMail from POP3 servers. 
I'm having trouble with the code that actually gets the data from the socket.
 My problem is that I don't know how to efficiently tell if more data is
coming from the server.

I can look for a single "." on the last line, but there are lots of other
occasions where the server may repond with a single line, or multiple lines. 
Right now, I just pause for a while at every socket read to wait for more
data.  If it doesn't come after a couple seconds, I assume there is no more
to be had.   This works, but is rather slow.

Does anybody have any ideas on how to determine the number of lines of data
to be retrieved from a socket?


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: The NerdWorld Organisation (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: timurkz@saxz.mmbankz.ruz                          24-Dec-99 11:28:22
  To: All                                               26-Dec-99 03:26:29
Subj: Re: How to Tell if There is More Data at Socket

From: "Timur Kazimirov" <timurkz@saxz.mmbankz.ruz>

On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 19:26:48 -0800 (PST), Casey Bralla wrote:

>I'm writing an application in Rexx that retreives eMail from POP3 servers. 
>I'm having trouble with the code that actually gets the data from the socket.
> My problem is that I don't know how to efficiently tell if more data is
>coming from the server.

When you register (USER and PASS command) you can see he size of
each message. You can check this by telnetting to 110 port of a POP server.
For example - part of session:
===
+OK OS2PopS 2.02 02 Jun 97 ready <1080.112711260000@timur.sax.mmbank.ru>
user timurk
+OK Password required for timurk
pass YjdtkkF
+OK timurk has 1 message(s) (8261 octets).
list
+OK 1 8261
1 8261
.
===
So I have 1 message with size of 8261 bytes

With best regards,
Timur Kazimirov

-- Remove all "z" from my address to reply



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Bank of Moscow, Sakhalin Branch (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: retsiemynnaht@spammoc.beoohaygon...               24-Dec-99 07:30:02
  To: All                                               26-Dec-99 03:26:29
Subj: Re: How to Tell if There is More Data at Socket

Message sender: retsiemynnaht@spammoc.beoohaygone.net

From: "Mike Ruskai" <retsiemynnaht@spammoc.beoohaygone.net>

On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 19:26:48 -0800 (PST), Casey Bralla wrote:

>I'm writing an application in Rexx that retreives eMail from POP3 servers. 
>I'm having trouble with the code that actually gets the data from the socket.
> My problem is that I don't know how to efficiently tell if more data is
>coming from the server.
>
>I can look for a single "." on the last line, but there are lots of other
>occasions where the server may repond with a single line, or multiple lines. 
>Right now, I just pause for a while at every socket read to wait for more
>data.  If it doesn't come after a couple seconds, I assume there is no more
>to be had.   This works, but is rather slow.
>
>Does anybody have any ideas on how to determine the number of lines of data
>to be retrieved from a socket?

If you look at RFC1725, which defines the POP3 protocol, you'll see that
the first <crlf>.<crlf> sequence *must* be the end of the message data. 
Any line beginning with a period will be byte-stuffed.  That is, it'll
have an additional period stuffed onto the beginning.  So, you'll also
need to look for <crlf>..<something else>, and change it to
<crlf>.<something else>.  This is done to any line beginning with a period
by the server.  It's the same thing you have to do when sending via SMTP,
as well.

In C/C++, you can use strstr() to look for the end sequence in the
received data.

For doing the translation of byte stuffing, a somewhat messy loop
involving strstr(), strncpy(), and a pointer variable will do.  C/C++ are
not good languages for string manipulation.  Another approach would be to
tokenize the data by line separation, which would make it easier to strip
the period from the front of any line, if it exists (for if there is one
period, there must be another).  




--
 - Mike

Remove 'spambegone.net' and reverse to send e-mail.


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: TLF (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: rde@tavi.co.uk                                    24-Dec-99 20:38:05
  To: All                                               26-Dec-99 03:27:00
Subj: Re: How to Tell if There is More Data at Socket

From: rde@tavi.co.uk (Bob Eager)

On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 12:30:04, "Mike Ruskai" 
<retsiemynnaht@spammoc.beoohaygone.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 19:26:48 -0800 (PST), Casey Bralla wrote:
> 
> >I'm writing an application in Rexx that retreives eMail from POP3 servers. 
> >I'm having trouble with the code that actually gets the data from the
socket.
> > My problem is that I don't know how to efficiently tell if more data is
> >coming from the server.

> If you look at RFC1725, which defines the POP3 protocol, you'll see that
> the first <crlf>.<crlf> sequence *must* be the end of the message data. 
> Any line beginning with a period will be byte-stuffed.  That is, it'll
> have an additional period stuffed onto the beginning.  So, you'll also
> need to look for <crlf>..<something else>, and change it to
> <crlf>.<something else>.  This is done to any line beginning with a period
> by the server.  It's the same thing you have to do when sending via SMTP,
> as well.

I have a cpile of REXX scripts which illustrate the algorithm. I wrote
them to fix a longstanding bug in Post Road Mailer (which didn't byte 
stuff correctly).

See:

     http://www.tavi.co.uk/os2pages/innoval/prdotfix.zip

-- 
Bob Eager
rde at tavi.co.uk
PC Server 325; PS/2s 8595*3, 9595*3 (2*P60 + P90), 8535, 8570, 9556*2,
8580*6,
8557*2, 8550, 9577, 8530, P70, PC/AT..

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Tavi Systems (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ddos@execpc.com                                   24-Dec-99 21:09:26
  To: All                                               26-Dec-99 03:27:01
Subj: TCP/IP in DOS sessions (Win-OS/2)

From: Brian Hertziger <ddos@execpc.com>

I've got TCP/IP working in DOS sessions, but it will not resolve names
via DNS during my dialup sessions.

TCP/IP 4.0, Warp 4, FP12.  OS/2 sessions work fine.  Pinging an IP
address works fine, but I can't ping a domain name and have it resolve.
They all come back "bad host"

Thanks in advance!



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: ExecPC Internet - Milwaukee, WI (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: hemo_jr@attglobal.net                             24-Dec-99 22:51:21
  To: All                                               26-Dec-99 03:27:01
Subj: Re: TCP/IP in DOS sessions (Win-OS/2)

From: "Matt Hickman" <hemo_jr@attglobal.net>

In <38643582$0$26023@news.execpc.com>, on 12/24/99 
   at 09:09 PM, Brian Hertziger <ddos@execpc.com> said:

>I've got TCP/IP working in DOS sessions, but it will not resolve names via
>DNS during my dialup sessions.

do you have an ETC environmental variable?  Does the
directory it point to have a valid resolv file?

-- 
Matt Hickman
     For a Martian to roll up is the moral equivalent of an
     Earthly duel to the death and is resorted to only when the 
     Martian is offended so completely that nothing else will 
     suffice.
                      - Robert A. Heinlein (1907-1988)
                       _Red Planet_ c. 1949

** Join "The Heinleiners" a SETI@home club **
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_17222.html

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & Ne
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ddos@execpc.com                                   25-Dec-99 20:48:28
  To: All                                               26-Dec-99 03:27:02
Subj: Re: TCP/IP in DOS sessions (Win-OS/2)

From: Brian Hertziger <ddos@execpc.com>

Thank you.  You fixed my problem.  The ETC variable was fine, but for
some reason there was only RESOLV.ORG, and no RESOLV file in that
directory.  I copied RESOLV.ORG to RESOLV and it worked beautifully!

Thanks for your assistance!

Matt Hickman wrote:
> 
> In <38643582$0$26023@news.execpc.com>, on 12/24/99
>    at 09:09 PM, Brian Hertziger <ddos@execpc.com> said:
> 
> >I've got TCP/IP working in DOS sessions, but it will not resolve names via
> >DNS during my dialup sessions.
> 
> do you have an ETC environmental variable?  Does the
> directory it point to have a valid resolv file?
> 
> --
> Matt Hickman
>      For a Martian to roll up is the moral equivalent of an
>      Earthly duel to the death and is resorted to only when the
>      Martian is offended so completely that nothing else will
>      suffice.
>                       - Robert A. Heinlein (1907-1988)
>                        _Red Planet_ c. 1949
> 
> ** Join "The Heinleiners" a SETI@home club **
> http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_17222.html

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: ExecPC Internet - Milwaukee, WI (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: bandyo_nospam@wam.umd.edu                         26-Dec-99 11:51:10
  To: All                                               26-Dec-99 16:43:06
Subj: Re: Help: TCPIP (still) getting messed up

From: Sushenjit Bandyopadhyay <bandyo_nospam@wam.umd.edu>

Thanks Trevor but it didn't work.  This is what I got when I was off 
line.

[F:\sushen\mybin]netstat -a
addr            0.0.0.0 interface 10 mask 0  broadcast            
0.0.0.0
addr          127.0.0.1 interface 0 mask ff000000  broadcast          
127.0.0.1

[F:\sushen\mybin]ifconfig ppp0 delete
ifconfig:ioctl (SIOCDIFADDR): no such interface

I tried ppp1 etc. But that didn't work too.  

Any more ideas? 

Thanks again.

Sushenjit

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 12-22-99, 8:58:55 PM, "Trevor Hemsley" 
<Trevor-Hemsley@dial.pipex.com> wrote regarding Re: Help: TCPIP getting 
messed up:


> On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:14:56 GMT, Sushenjit Bandyopadhyay wrote:

> ->How can I get rid of the reference to 0.0.0.0?  What is
> ->the correct syntax for route delete in this case?  Is there any 
other
> ->way to get rid of 0.0.0.0?

> Try ifconfig ppp0 delete


> Trevor Hemsley, Brighton, UK
> (Trevor-Hemsley@dial.pipex.com or 75704.2477@compuserve.com)



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: University of Maryland, College Park (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: alDOTdunsmuir@sympatico.ca                        27-Dec-99 00:40:03
  To: All                                               26-Dec-99 21:26:25
Subj: Re: Injoy Firewall

From: "Al Dunsmuir" <alDOTdunsmuir@sympatico.ca>

Vit,

While the released version of InJoy Firewall does not support PPPoE,  
there is a new version of InJoy Firewall under development that supports
PPPoE very well.    A number of us on Sympatico HSE and other providers
have been working with Bjarne, doing testing and contributing suggestions.
I would suggest that anyone who wants to join the beta should contact
Bjarne (bj@fx.dk) directly.

I've been using as my primary internet access mechanism for most of the
last 2 months.   It has been incredibly fast, and reliable.   The new GUI in
GWPM makes it trivial to establish the PPPoE configuration and connection.

This original post was related to a problem that was caused by an accidental
misconfiguration of GWPM by the end user.   These things happen.  It was 
corrected, partly as a result of useful suggestions by other posters.

I find it in poor taste for you to take this as an opportunity to flog your
product,
which competes with InJoy  - especially given the acknowledgement that the
critical core of your product was originally based on mmispringInJoy
source code (ref http://www.os2bbs.com/os2news/OS2News2.html).

Al  

On 15 Dec 1999 16:52:48 GMT, Vit Timchishin wrote:

>On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 04:20:38, "Stephen Eickhoff (remove the - to reply)" 
><operagost@e-mail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've only been able to get a maximum of about 25Kbps, and an average of a
>> measly 10Kbps out of my 640Kbps ADSL. I suspected three things:
>
>AFAIR Bell Atlantics is using PPPoE. If so, you can try SafeFire PPP. Users 
>already reported that they has no problems with this provider and that they
are 
>happy with speed.
> 
>Check http://www.lgs.kiev.ua



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Sympatico (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jpolt@bradnet.legend.co.uk                        27-Dec-99 12:37:22
  To: All                                               27-Dec-99 11:16:04
Subj: hostname

From: jpolt@bradnet.legend.co.uk (John Poltorak)

Where does the hostname command look for the name of the local host?

The choices I'm aware of are environment, hosts file or DNS.

I assume this command is a straight port of the Unix command so that if
I found a manpage for hostname, that would provide a definitive answer...

--
John

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Legend Internet Ltd (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: tvv@sbs.kiev.ua                                   27-Dec-99 11:16:09
  To: All                                               27-Dec-99 11:16:04
Subj: Re: Injoy Firewall

From: tvv@sbs.kiev.ua (Vit Timchishin)

On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 00:40:07, "Al Dunsmuir" <alDOTdunsmuir@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> Vit,
> 
> While the released version of InJoy Firewall does not support PPPoE,  
> there is a new version of InJoy Firewall under development that supports
> PPPoE very well.    A number of us on Sympatico HSE and other providers
> have been working with Bjarne, doing testing and contributing suggestions.
> I would suggest that anyone who wants to join the beta should contact
> Bjarne (bj@fx.dk) directly.

But Bjarne in comp.os.os2.comm said that one must pay for Injoy Firewall
before 
trying new function (to simply to get a copy). AFAIK this is not an option for 

many people.

> 
> I've been using as my primary internet access mechanism for most of the
> last 2 months.   It has been incredibly fast, and reliable.   The new GUI in
> GWPM makes it trivial to establish the PPPoE configuration and connection.

I am happy you have it working.
> 
> This original post was related to a problem that was caused by an accidental
> misconfiguration of GWPM by the end user.   These things happen.  It was 
> corrected, partly as a result of useful suggestions by other posters.
> 
> I find it in poor taste for you to take this as an opportunity to flog your
> product,
> which competes with InJoy  

I simply gave him an URL. I neither said that Injoy is bad nor posted any long 

advertisement. I think that user must have right to choose if it is possible.

> - especially given the acknowledgement that the
> critical core of your product was originally based on mmispringInJoy
> source code (ref http://www.os2bbs.com/os2news/OS2News2.html).

Sorry, but the problem was with SafeFire Firewall, not SafeFire PPP.

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Navigator Online Internet News Server (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: dropThis.DenverD@Delphi.com                       27-Dec-99 18:34:24
  To: All                                               27-Dec-99 15:56:10
Subj: Re: Injoy Firewall

From: dropThis.DenverD@Delphi.com (DenverD )

In message <47fkd6T3ejeb-pn2-PcMzkd1xQZSz@tivv> - tvv@sbs.kiev.ua (Vit
Timchishin)27 Dec 1999 11:16:18 GMT writes:
>
>Sorry, but the problem was with SafeFire Firewall, not SafeFire PPP.
>

no, now the problem is with everything LGS ever tries to sell..
ever..
who wants to buy from pirates and thieves?

you folks blew it...
you had talent and you might could have made a go out of selling something
you created yourselves.....

but, now we ALL have to wonder if maybe everything you try to sell is stolen
property...

or, maybe what you sell is just a trojan horse stuck in stolen software that
will let you into OUR computers so you can steal our bank, stock broker or
ISP passwords..

no thanks, you showed us your color..

we ain't buying your stuff, ever...

go away...steal some winders code and scam that crowd....they are not quite
as hard to trick--

--
DenverD AT delphi DOT com
All addresses are anti-spam spoofs...you gotta fix'em up to mail me...sorry!

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: www.Texan.dk (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ivan@protein.bio.msu.su                           27-Dec-99 21:43:27
  To: All                                               27-Dec-99 15:56:10
Subj: Re: Injoy Firewall

From: "Ivan Adzhubei" <ivan@protein.bio.msu.su>

In <848bg9$7qu$3@news.inet.tele.dk>, on 12/27/99 
   at 06:34 PM, dropThis.DenverD@Delphi.com (DenverD ) said:

>In message <47fkd6T3ejeb-pn2-PcMzkd1xQZSz@tivv> - tvv@sbs.kiev.ua (Vit
>Timchishin)27 Dec 1999 11:16:18 GMT writes:
>>
>>Sorry, but the problem was with SafeFire Firewall, not SafeFire PPP.

>no, now the problem is with everything LGS ever tries to sell.. ever..
>who wants to buy from pirates and thieves?

So you have the right to proclaim people guilty, even without hearing the
case? Don't be ridiculous. Or is this how justice is understood in your
part of the world?

>you folks blew it...
>you had talent and you might could have made a go out of selling
>something you created yourselves.....

I have no connection to LGS in any way, so I don't know whom you are
addressing. If you have something to tell to people at LGS - e-mail them.

Cheers,
Ivan

>but, now we ALL have to wonder if maybe everything you try to sell is
>stolen property...

>or, maybe what you sell is just a trojan horse stuck in stolen software
>that will let you into OUR computers so you can steal our bank, stock
>broker or ISP passwords..

>no thanks, you showed us your color..

>we ain't buying your stuff, ever...

>go away...steal some winders code and scam that crowd....they are not
>quite as hard to trick--

>--
>DenverD AT delphi DOT com
>All addresses are anti-spam spoofs...you gotta fix'em up to mail
>me...sorry!

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Ivan Adzhubei" <ivan@protein.bio.msu.su>
-----------------------------------------------------------

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Moscow State University (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: ccsten@usa.net                                    27-Dec-99 16:23:13
  To: jpolt@bradnet.legend.co.uk                        27-Dec-99 22:22:29
Subj: Re: hostname

To: John Poltorak <jpolt@bradnet.legend.co.uk>
From: Terry Norton <ccsten@usa.net>

John Poltorak wrote:
> 
> Where does the hostname command look for the name of the local host?
> 
> The choices I'm aware of are environment, hosts file or DNS.
> 
> I assume this command is a straight port of the Unix command so that if
> I found a manpage for hostname, that would provide a definitive answer...
> 
> --
> John

In your Config.sys file.  In mine is:

SET HOSTNAME=terry

-- 

Terry Norton
Warped with OS/2

    A sign of the '90s:
       Your supervisor doesn't have the ability to do your job.

This OS/2 system uptime is 1 days 04 hours 12 minutes (en).

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Together Networks - Burlington, VT. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: Trevor-Hemsley@dial.pipex.com                     27-Dec-99 21:35:05
  To: All                                               27-Dec-99 22:22:29
Subj: Re: Help: TCPIP (still) getting messed up

From: "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor-Hemsley@dial.pipex.com>

On Sun, 26 Dec 1999 11:51:20 GMT, Sushenjit Bandyopadhyay wrote:

->[F:\sushen\mybin]ifconfig ppp0 delete
->ifconfig:ioctl (SIOCDIFADDR): no such interface
->
->I tried ppp1 etc. But that didn't work too.

Try ifconfig sl0 delete (that's Ess ELL zero)


Trevor Hemsley, Brighton, UK
(Trevor-Hemsley@dial.pipex.com or 75704.2477@compuserve.com)



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: UUNET WorldCom server (post doesn't reflect views
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jpolt@bradnet.legend.co.uk                        28-Dec-99 02:48:06
  To: All                                               28-Dec-99 02:36:14
Subj: NSUPDATE

From: jpolt@bradnet.legend.co.uk (John Poltorak)

Can someone provide me with an example of using NSUPDATE?

I've just converted my cfg files from DNS to DDNS and am trying to apply
an update, but can't make any sense of the help screen. I haven't found
any docs on how to use NSUPDATE.

--
John


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Legend Internet Ltd (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: dropThis.DenverD@Delphi.com                       28-Dec-99 06:58:04
  To: All                                               28-Dec-99 03:17:21
Subj: Re: Injoy Firewall

From: dropThis.DenverD@Delphi.com (DenverD )

In message <gvzhexfnkzzonaxeh.fnfzh31.pminews@news.sax.mmbank.ru> - "Timur
Kazimirov" <timurkz@saxz.mmbankz.ruz> writes:
>
>On 27 Dec 1999 18:34:49 GMT, DenverD  wrote:
>
>>no, now the problem is with everything LGS ever tries to sell..
>>ever..
>>who wants to buy from pirates and thieves?
>
>Is this proven? As I can see you have took a God's functions for yourself

of course it is proven..
look at the documentation LGS put out..
it IS the F/X documentation..

look at the configurations files LGS used...
and the size of the binaries...

and the code HAS BEEN compared side by side..

>
>If you have something to say - go to the courthouse and say this.

nice try there Mr. Kazimirov..
(as he tries to appeal to the buying public to WAIT for a court finding, but
keep buying the stolen software LGS is shutdown..)

sorry, it won't work that way..
we know who stole what and the justice seeking buyers ain't buying what LSG
stole..

or even the stuff they *maybe* wrote all by themselves...
now we don't trust even that..

--
DenverD AT delphi DOT com
All addresses are anti-spam spoofs...you gotta fix'em up to mail me...sorry!

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: www.Texan.dk (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: timurkz@saxz.mmbankz.ruz                          28-Dec-99 11:01:01
  To: All                                               28-Dec-99 05:20:09
Subj: Re: Injoy Firewall

From: "Timur Kazimirov" <timurkz@saxz.mmbankz.ruz>

On 28 Dec 1999 06:58:09 GMT, DenverD  wrote:

>of course it is proven..
>look at the documentation LGS put out..
>it IS the F/X documentation..

I will check it

>look at the configurations files LGS used...
>and the size of the binaries...

Will check this too. I'm too interested with the true

>nice try there Mr. Kazimirov..

Too official, isn't it? :-)

I don't use LGS's or FX's products - I don't need ones.
TCP/IP from OS/2 contains all needed things to create
PPP server, NAT, firewall and etc. I can say more - no one
has to be a _very_ good programmer to combine all
these things :-)

With best regards,
Timur Kazimirov

-- Remove all "z" from my address to reply



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Bank of Moscow, Sakhalin Branch (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: uno@40th.com                                      28-Dec-99 11:16:21
  To: All                                               28-Dec-99 10:22:01
Subj: Re: Injoy Firewall

From: uno@40th.com (uno@40th.com)

DenverD? (dropThis.DenverD@Delphi.com?) wrote (28 Dec 1999 06:58:09 GMT):
>of course it is proven..
>look at the documentation LGS put out..
>it IS the F/X documentation..

I'm sure no one at LGS thought anything odd about that.
BAU over there.  Of course, and here's the scary part,
LGS can just about put F/X out of business by releasing
this stuff for free, w/source (couldn't trust it otherwise
-- could you?).


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Yanaguana (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: nospam@nospam.noway.com                           28-Dec-99 11:21:14
  To: All                                               28-Dec-99 14:16:07
Subj: Re: Injoy Firewall

From: "Roberto F. Salomon" <nospam@nospam.noway.com>

On Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:01:02 +0300 (MSK), Timur Kazimirov wrote:

[...]
>I don't use LGS's or FX's products - I don't need ones.
>TCP/IP from OS/2 contains all needed things to create
>PPP server, NAT, firewall and etc. I can say more - no one
>has to be a _very_ good programmer to combine all
>these things :-)

I have been trying to find information on configuring NAT under OS/2's TCP/IP
without the use of any external software.  Apparently you have been able to
do so.  Could you please post your findings?

Roberto


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: nospam (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: dwblkb@attglobal.net                              28-Dec-99 10:31:12
  To: All                                               28-Dec-99 14:16:07
Subj: getting warp4 to manage a domain

From: Dan&Lori Buchanan <dwblkb@attglobal.net>

I don't know if this is possible with a single user version of warp 4
but there's only 1 way to find out.  I want to configure my warp 4 to
manage a domain  once this is done then I need to figure out how to
share a ppp connection with other computers on our net.  I know I need
to set up a dns but that's about all i know.  OS/2 has packet forwarding
so I assume once I get this turned on other people on my net will enjoy
a invisible proxy connection to the net.  Right now i'm using a proxy
server and it's a pain.  The proxy server won't pass java through
correctly and there are several other small problems with it.

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: dwblkb@attglobal.net                              28-Dec-99 10:37:23
  To: All                                               28-Dec-99 14:16:07
Subj: Re: PMMail behind IPMasq? Works once, then reboot needed.

From: Dan&Lori Buchanan <dwblkb@attglobal.net>

well i don't think i gate correctly passes the pop/smtp commands through
correctly.  I finally had to set up my own udp ports on 25.  This works great
as
long as everyone has the same e-mail server, if they don't then this won't
work.
Also i've had problems getting igate to pass java code and calls through
correctly.

Richard James wrote:

> In article <g35W44HwKBOU089yn@home.com>, stephen-d@home.com says...
> > I have set up a home network that uses a Linux machine to do IP
> > Masquerading. The internet access is through @Home with Rogers cable in
> > Toronto.
>
> > On the OS/2 machine I run PMMail. When I access my mail accounts
> > with @Home everything is normal for the first few times. Then, the check
> > for mail run returns as though I have no mail. It connects, but no error.
I
> > do have email, though!
>
> Hmmm... weird. I ran the OS/2 version of PMMail with Shaw@home here in
> Victoria for almost a year. I used IGate (Proxy server). I had no trouble
> with the machine running IGate, but could not access mail from other
> machines on the network. When I switched (forced to) WinNT, I had the
> same problem with the Win versions of Igate and PMMail.
>
> About 6 weeks ago I changed to a linux box as a firewall (using the EDGE
> Router software... runs Linux and the router off a 1.8meg floppy!) Now I
> can do everything from everywhere, FTP, mail, Secure web (i.e.
> banking)etc.
>
> Looks like a configuration problem or "something" is getting changed. One
> possibility mentioned in a reply already is check the route to the server
> (Tracert) at least it should tell you which box is causing the problem
> (one of yours or one of Rogers....
>
> --
> From an Island in the Pacific,
> Richard James, Victoria, BC

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: timurkz@saxz.mmbankz.ruz                          29-Dec-99 03:31:03
  To: All                                               29-Dec-99 00:20:04
Subj: Re: Injoy Firewall

From: "Timur Kazimirov" <timurkz@saxz.mmbankz.ruz>

On Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:21:28 -0500 (EST), Roberto F. Salomon wrote:

>I have been trying to find information on configuring NAT under OS/2's TCP/IP
>without the use of any external software.

Sure. It requires some programming.

> Apparently you have been able to do so.  Could you please
>post your findings?

There are two _very_ good starting points at Hobbes - 
tcpdumpb.zip and ipspy140.zip.
Analyze the source, make changes and that's all.

With best regards,
Timur Kazimirov

-- Remove all "z" from my address to reply



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Bank of Moscow, Sakhalin Branch (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: abstewa@attglobal.net                             28-Dec-99 22:07:02
  To: All                                               29-Dec-99 03:28:03
Subj: Re: OS2 warp 4 in a NT enviornment

From: Alon Stewart <abstewa@attglobal.net>

I have not been able to get an OS/2 PC to use Wins to resolve a hostname.  I
have
Netbeui and netbios settings as mentioned below and can register with both the
Wins server and the NT Domain server.  When 'host somehost' is entered, the
Wins
server is queried but will not resolve the name.  Query they returns to the
hosts
file on the local machine.  Nslookup and hostname URL lookups from Netscape
4.61
both work, however.  Any idea why the Wins won't return a valid IP for a
hostname
request from the OS/2 PC?

Matt Hickman wrote:

> In <bLb84.4259$4l1.22667@news.rdc1.ct.home.com>, on 12/22/99
>    at 09:53 PM, "Tom Mucha" <tom@ctomp.com> said:
>
> >I have a workstation running Warp4 and I'm trying to get it to use WINS off
> >of our NT network.  I'm able to do all the pinging by ip address, but not
> >by name.   Also, I'm hoping by getting wins working, I'll be able to get
> >out of our MS-Proxy server to access the internet.  Anyone have any info on
> >either of those things?  Much thank if you do!
>
> You can get WINS to work (sorta -- WINS is somewhat nonstandard)
> by setting up the NetBeui Node type as hybrid (H) and setting up the
> Netbios Name servers with the WINS IP address.
>
> But that probably won't get you through the Proxy.  For that you need
> to log the Warp workstation onto an NT domain trusted by the Proxy.
>
> --
> Matt Hickman
>   When any government...undertakes to say to say to its subjects, "This
>   is what you may not read, this is what you must see, this you are
forbidden
>   to know," the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy the
>   motives.
>                          Robert A. Heinlein (1907 - 1988)
>                          "If This Goes On--" ASF  c.1940
>
> ** Join "The Heinleiners" a SETI@home club **
> http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_17222.html

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & Ne
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: domi@kenavo.NOSPAM.fi                             29-Dec-99 07:34:23
  To: All                                               29-Dec-99 05:08:07
Subj: Re: getting warp4 to manage a domain

From: domi@kenavo.NOSPAM.fi (Dominique Pivard)

You'll find the OS/2 port of BIND in 
ftp://hobbes.nmsu.edu/pub/os2/apps/internet/util

On Tue, 28 Dec 1999 16:31:24, Dan&Lori Buchanan <dwblkb@attglobal.net>
wrote:

> I know I need to set up a dns but that's about all i know.

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: None!! (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: msmanju@mindless.com                              29-Dec-99 19:59:21
  To: All                                               29-Dec-99 14:23:18
Subj: Re: setsockopt:  no buffer Space Available

From: Manjunatha M S <msmanju@mindless.com>

Can you just post the netstat outputs during couple of perionds
 1. during normal operation
 2. after 24 hours
 3. time when IP is about to stop working

netstat -s , netstat -m and netstat -r

cheers
Manju


Wilson Rook wrote:

> I am running  a Warp 4 compter, fp12, tcpip 4.1 as a DNS server.
> I am running bind 8.2.1 port for os/2.
> The TCPIP Level is 5.3007/1/6.  I
> have not added the 8610 or 8620 FP.
> I also am running daytimed for time service.
> I have activated the TCP/IP 4.1 Stack Firewall
> I have 2 other computers that are also running this
> configuration except they are not running daytimed or the firewall.
>
> I have gotten the folloiwng error
>
> setsockopt:  no buffer Space Available
>
> The computer will run for 2-3 days just fine - then IP will
> lock up.
>
> Any Ideas?

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: xxxxx (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: nospam@nospam.noway.com                           29-Dec-99 09:37:08
  To: All                                               29-Dec-99 14:23:18
Subj: NAT and OS/2 

From: "Roberto F. Salomon" <nospam@nospam.noway.com>

On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 03:31:07 +0300 (MSK), Timur Kazimirov wrote:

[...]
>
>There are two _very_ good starting points at Hobbes - 
>tcpdumpb.zip and ipspy140.zip.
>Analyze the source, make changes and that's all.

Thanks for the tip. I'll give it a try and probably ask for help if anything
happens. 

Best regards and a happy new year

Roberto Salomon


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: nospam (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: not-bigshorts@interested.earthli...               29-Dec-99 14:39:15
  To: All                                               29-Dec-99 14:23:18
Subj: Winsock under Warp 3

Message sender: not-bigshorts@interested.earthlink.net

From: not-bigshorts@interested.earthlink.net (Carl S.)

How do you fix it so you can use win-os2 i'net apps? have vdos and ppp
update but still get dns error when I try to use anything...



Thanks,

Carl

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: EarthLink Network, Inc. (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: hemo_jr@attglobal.net                             29-Dec-99 20:12:02
  To: All                                               30-Dec-99 03:28:09
Subj: Re: OS2 warp 4 in a NT enviornment

From: "Matt Hickman" <hemo_jr@attglobal.net>

In <38697AD8.DEC25424@attglobal.net>, on 12/28/99 
   at 10:07 PM, Alon Stewart <abstewa@attglobal.net> said:

>I have not been able to get an OS/2 PC to use Wins to resolve a hostname. 
>I have Netbeui and netbios settings as mentioned below and can register
>with both the Wins server and the NT Domain server.  When 'host somehost'
>is entered, the Wins server is queried but will not resolve the name. 
>Query they returns to the hosts file on the local machine.  Nslookup and
>hostname URL lookups from Netscape 4.61 both work, however.  Any idea why
>the Wins won't return a valid IP for a hostname request from the OS/2 PC?

You will never get WINS to talk to Nebeui.  WINS is for TCPBeui (aka NBTCP
aka RFC Netbios aka netBIOS over TCP/IP).  Take out Netbeui, put in TCPBeui.
It might be easier jest to reinstall.  If you continue to have problems, ask
here again.

-- 
Matt Hickman
  one real improvement...was the universal checkbook system; with 
  a single cybernet as a clearing house for the whole city and 
  radioactive coding on my checkbook, I got cash in my palm as quickly
  as at my home bank...
                         Robert A. Heinlein (1907 - 1988)
                         _The Door Into Summer_ 1956

** Join "The Heinleiners" a SETI@home club **
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_17222.html

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & Ne
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jim.danvers@mindex.com                            29-Dec-99 23:08:29
  To: All                                               30-Dec-99 03:28:09
Subj: How can I...?

From: Jim Danvers <jim.danvers@mindex.com>

Hi folks...

I'm using OS/2 warp v4 on an older compaq p120 as I write this and for
the most part it works (surprisingly) well.  I'm trying to minimize
overhead with it though in that I'm just using the command interpreter
as the workplace shell (vs. the WPS) and I have my startup.cmd file just
launching a command prompt with a character based menu of apps, etc..
that I can use.  Blah blah blah...  sorry.

Here is what I'm wondering:  I am evaluating / playing around with a
dialer called injoy (that I must say I really do like) that I use to
connect to my ISP.  I have my ISP config defined as the default profile
that injoy uses @startup and it auto-magically dials it each time that I
start injoy.  Ok - this is cool.  I am also using a freeware (I think
its free anyway) FTP server that gets started at bootup via
startup.cmd.  What I would really like to be able to do is write a .cmd
/ (rexx?) script that would start injoy and then wait (sleep?) for
roughly a minute or so to give the dialer time to establish the
connection to my ISP, and then somehow obtain what my PC's current IP
address is (as assigned from the ISP) and then have that info get send
to me via an SMTP mailer.

Why?  The objective here is that if I'm at work, and I want to get to
something on my PC, I could just have my wife or someone at the house
fire up the connection and have it auto-magically send me the IP address
that I would need to know in order to connect (via FTP) back to my
machine.  In case anyone is wondering - I'm basicaly using the box as a
"file server" on my home lan - thus the FTP server - I just store my
downloads and whatnot on this box keeping my other machines HD's a
little less cluttered.  I understand that I would obviuosly have to
setup some sort of command line e-mailer (the NT world has one called
BLAT) to send myself the e-mails..  does anyone know of a method for
doing this in OS/2?   Is this a little bit of a far fetched ideaa??

Thanks folks...

-=- J.D. -=-


--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: DLaRue@NetSRQ.Com                                 30-Dec-99 05:05:09
  To: All                                               30-Dec-99 03:28:09
Subj: Re: How can I...?

From: DLaRue@NetSRQ.Com (David LaRue)

  Hi J.D.,

  Look in the In-Joy directory for the file connect.txt.  This contains the
last
connect information that your ISP returned.  Your address will be in there.
I use DoD (Dial On Demand) to perform similar actions.  I poll mail every
couple
hours and have scripts set up to process only messages from me.  That way
I can turn the connection on remotely and keep it on over the lunch hour or
whenever I like.  

  sendmail.exe is part of your TCP package.  It can be used from the command 
line to send preformed text files.  A REXX script could parse the connect.txt
or perhaps you just want to send it.

  PMMail also has a command line send utility.  There are REXX Scripts and
many code snipets to send via SMTP.  If you become worried about security
most PGP implementations have command line access.

  http://hobbes.nmsu.edu is a good source for many pieces of your puzzle.
You can probably implement all of them on your own with a few hours work.

  Enjoy,

  David

In <386ADAD9.19CEAFE4@mindex.com>, Jim Danvers <jim.danvers@mindex.com>
writes:
>Hi folks...
>
>I'm using OS/2 warp v4 on an older compaq p120 as I write this and for
>the most part it works (surprisingly) well.  I'm trying to minimize
>overhead with it though in that I'm just using the command interpreter
>as the workplace shell (vs. the WPS) and I have my startup.cmd file just
>launching a command prompt with a character based menu of apps, etc..
>that I can use.  Blah blah blah...  sorry.
>
>Here is what I'm wondering:  I am evaluating / playing around with a
>dialer called injoy (that I must say I really do like) that I use to
>connect to my ISP.  I have my ISP config defined as the default profile
>that injoy uses @startup and it auto-magically dials it each time that I
>start injoy.  Ok - this is cool.  I am also using a freeware (I think
>its free anyway) FTP server that gets started at bootup via
>startup.cmd.  What I would really like to be able to do is write a .cmd
>/ (rexx?) script that would start injoy and then wait (sleep?) for
>roughly a minute or so to give the dialer time to establish the
>connection to my ISP, and then somehow obtain what my PC's current IP
>address is (as assigned from the ISP) and then have that info get send
>to me via an SMTP mailer.
>
>Why?  The objective here is that if I'm at work, and I want to get to
>something on my PC, I could just have my wife or someone at the house
>fire up the connection and have it auto-magically send me the IP address
>that I would need to know in order to connect (via FTP) back to my
>machine.  In case anyone is wondering - I'm basicaly using the box as a
>"file server" on my home lan - thus the FTP server - I just store my
>downloads and whatnot on this box keeping my other machines HD's a
>little less cluttered.  I understand that I would obviuosly have to
>setup some sort of command line e-mailer (the NT world has one called
>BLAT) to send myself the e-mails..  does anyone know of a method for
>doing this in OS/2?   Is this a little bit of a far fetched ideaa??
>
>Thanks folks...
>
>-=- J.D. -=-
>
>

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: bCandid - Powering the world's discussions - http
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: moschleg@erols.com                                30-Dec-99 01:13:03
  To: All                                               30-Dec-99 03:28:10
Subj: Re: How can I...?

From: Mark Schlegel <moschleg@erols.com>

David LaRue wrote:
> 
>   Hi J.D.,
> 
>   Look in the In-Joy directory for the file connect.txt.  This contains the
last
> connect information that your ISP returned.  Your address will be in there.
> I use DoD (Dial On Demand) to perform similar actions.  I poll mail every
couple
> hours and have scripts set up to process only messages from me.  That way
> I can turn the connection on remotely and keep it on over the lunch hour or
> whenever I like.
> 
>   sendmail.exe is part of your TCP package.  It can be used from the command
> line to send preformed text files.  A REXX script could parse the
connect.txt
> or perhaps you just want to send it.

Also notice that in injoy you can have injoy run a script right after
connection is made, see "Misc opt" --> "Autostarting modules".  You
would want to use "host connect" for the start option and nothing in
the stop option column for your script.  This all makes sleeping one
minute unnecessary.

Mark

>   PMMail also has a command line send utility.  There are REXX Scripts and
> many code snipets to send via SMTP.  If you become worried about security
> most PGP implementations have command line access.
> 
>   http://hobbes.nmsu.edu is a good source for many pieces of your puzzle.
> You can probably implement all of them on your own with a few hours work.
> 
>   Enjoy,
> 
>   David
> 
> In <386ADAD9.19CEAFE4@mindex.com>, Jim Danvers <jim.danvers@mindex.com>
writes:
> > ..........
> > What I would really like to be able to do is write a .cmd
> >/ (rexx?) script that would start injoy and then wait (sleep?) for
> >roughly a minute or so to give the dialer time to establish the
> >connection to my ISP, and then somehow obtain what my PC's current IP
> >address is (as assigned from the ISP) and then have that info get send
> >to me via an SMTP mailer.
> >  ...........
> >-=- J.D. -=-
> >
> >

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: bran.everseeking@sk.sympatico.ca                  30-Dec-99 09:17:00
  To: All                                               30-Dec-99 10:25:02
Subj: Re: How can I...?

From: bran.everseeking@sk.sympatico.ca (Bran Everseeking)

On Thu, 30 Dec 1999 04:08:58, Jim Danvers <jim.danvers@mindex.com> 
wrote:
follow ups limited 
|>  I want to get to
|> something on my PC, I could just have my wife or someone at the house
|> fire up the connection and have it auto-magically send me the IP address
|> that I would need to know in order to connect

there is a little program at hobbes called web modifier that runs from
injoy that posts a link to a web-page you define.  this would have the
advantage of being availible anywhere not just at the office.

alternitivly one of the dynamic nameservers with an auto update run 
from injoy would serve.

the email idea seems limited to a single location.

--
--------------------------------
advice?   hrmm,  Be your own hero,
conduct yourself as if you are  the
best of divinity and be gentle firmly.
bran.everseeking@sk.sympatico.ca
--------------------------------

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Origin Line 1 Goes Here (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jluiz@neocomm.com.br                              30-Dec-99 12:39:17
  To: All                                               30-Dec-99 14:30:05
Subj: Multicast File Transfer Tool for OS/2

From: Joao Luiz P Jr <jluiz@neocomm.com.br>

Hello everybody,
We just released the NeoComm Vector for OS/2 version GA1.00. It's a file

transfer utility that uses multicast technology in a one-to-may basis.
Ours tests showed a bandwidth saving up to 70% compared to conventional
FTP.

More information at: http://www.neocomm.com


Best Regards,

Joao Luiz P. Jr.
Project Manager - NeoComm





--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: NeoComm (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@b...               30-Dec-99 16:21:02
  To: All                                               30-Dec-99 14:30:05
Subj: route bug ?

Message sender: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@bromo.email.ch

From: jms%email.de%email.de%email.de@bromo.email.ch (Jens)

For every TCPIP connection there is a route added to the routing 
table. For example the entry for 199.188.177.66

But this route is already defined thru the default route so it is 
redundant. Why is it added anyway ?

  destination             router                netmask     metric 
flags intrf
default                200.100.10.10          0.0.0.0           0  
UGSP   ppp0
127.0.0.1              127.0.0.1              255.255.255.255   0    
UH     lo
199.188.177.66         200.100.10.10          255.255.255.255   0 
UGHW3   ppp0

Thanks,
Jens

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: JMS Consulting (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: tvoltagg@home.com                                 30-Dec-99 19:59:27
  To: All                                               30-Dec-99 19:59:11
Subj: Re: TCP/IP in DOS sessions (Win-OS/2)

From: tvoltagg@home.com

Be sure that
1  -set etc=x:\tcpip\dos\bin is in your autoexec.bat
2 - copy "resolv2"  and call it "resolv" and put it in x:\tcpip\dos\bin
3 - be sure that the OS/2 winsock.dll is the only winsock in your path; delete 
all other winsocks

In <38643582$0$26023@news.execpc.com>, Brian Hertziger <ddos@execpc.com>
writes:
>I've got TCP/IP working in DOS sessions, but it will not resolve names
>via DNS during my dialup sessions.
>
>TCP/IP 4.0, Warp 4, FP12.  OS/2 sessions work fine.  Pinging an IP
>address works fine, but I can't ping a domain name and have it resolve.
>They all come back "bad host"
>
>Thanks in advance!
>
>
>


Tom Voltaggio
Team OS/2 - Southern New Jersey  USA

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Team OS/2 (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: rde@tavi.co.uk                                    30-Dec-99 21:18:28
  To: All                                               30-Dec-99 19:59:12
Subj: Re: How can I...?

From: rde@tavi.co.uk (Bob Eager)

On Thu, 30 Dec 1999 04:08:58, Jim Danvers <jim.danvers@mindex.com> 
wrote:

> Why?  The objective here is that if I'm at work, and I want to get to
> something on my PC, I could just have my wife or someone at the house
> fire up the connection and have it auto-magically send me the IP address

Well, as long as you have REXX support loaded....should be easy.

How's about this for a really low resource solution?

REXX script...

Dials

Waits a minute

Connects to the SMTP server at the ISP
talks SMTP to it to send you the IP address
disconnects

SMTP is VERY easy, and if you load the REXX IP support you won't even 
need a mailer for the command line!


-- 
Bob Eager
rde at tavi.co.uk
PC Server 325; PS/2s 8595*3, 9595*3 (2*P60 + P90), 8535, 8570, 9556*2,
8580*6,
8557*2, 8550, 9577, 8530, P70, PC/AT..

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Tavi Systems (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: abstewa@attglobal.net                             30-Dec-99 23:28:17
  To: All                                               31-Dec-99 03:17:19
Subj: Re: OS2 warp 4 in a NT enviornment

From: Alon Stewart <abstewa@attglobal.net>

My mistake on the Netbeui, I do have TCPbeui as the protocol.  At one time I
had both but I
removed the Netbeui, but without success with the Wins server.  Another
strange thing is
although I don't have localhost configured because it interferes with my
Exceed X-window
software, whenever I address any TCP/IP request to localhost I get the
response from the
Domain Name Server and not my local PC.   I know that the request to the Wins
server is
getting to the server because I have changed the server IP in the dhcpd.cfg
file and get an
error saying the server is not a name server.   I think something is
configured wrong, but I
just can't find it.  Any ideas?

Matt Hickman wrote:

> In <38697AD8.DEC25424@attglobal.net>, on 12/28/99
>    at 10:07 PM, Alon Stewart <abstewa@attglobal.net> said:
>
> >I have not been able to get an OS/2 PC to use Wins to resolve a hostname.
> >I have Netbeui and netbios settings as mentioned below and can register
> >with both the Wins server and the NT Domain server.  When 'host somehost'
> >is entered, the Wins server is queried but will not resolve the name.
> >Query they returns to the hosts file on the local machine.  Nslookup and
> >hostname URL lookups from Netscape 4.61 both work, however.  Any idea why
> >the Wins won't return a valid IP for a hostname request from the OS/2 PC?
>
> You will never get WINS to talk to Nebeui.  WINS is for TCPBeui (aka NBTCP
> aka RFC Netbios aka netBIOS over TCP/IP).  Take out Netbeui, put in TCPBeui.
> It might be easier jest to reinstall.  If you continue to have problems, ask 
here again.
>
> --
> Matt Hickman
>   one real improvement...was the universal checkbook system; with
>   a single cybernet as a clearing house for the whole city and
>   radioactive coding on my checkbook, I got cash in my palm as quickly
>   as at my home bank...
>                          Robert A. Heinlein (1907 - 1988)
>                          _The Door Into Summer_ 1956
>
> ** Join "The Heinleiners" a SETI@home club **
> http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_17222.html

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & Ne
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: knud_ch@post1.tele.dk                             31-Dec-99 08:18:23
  To: All                                               31-Dec-99 05:16:12
Subj: WARP 3 using TCPIP as default protocol

From: Knud <knud_ch@post1.tele.dk>

Hi

I have tried to TCP/IP as the only protocol between my 3 PC's ( WIN95,
WIN311, WARP 3 ).
But the sharing / using drives ( maybee also printers  ) across the LAN
( 10M eth ) doesnt work, pinging, FTP, WEB etc. works fine, the WIN311
and the WIN95 can works perfect with only the TCPIP protocol installed. 
I have tried to install NETBIOS over TCPIP without anything change. I
have also a WARP 4 installation on the WARP pc with same result.
I am running FP40 and WR08620+ the AFNB fix. ( I was using WR08610
before with same result ).

Any ideas ?

Knud

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Customer of Tele Danmark Internet (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: timurkz@saxz.mmbankz.ruz                          31-Dec-99 11:21:10
  To: All                                               31-Dec-99 05:16:12
Subj: Re: WARP 3 using TCPIP as default protocol

From: "Timur Kazimirov" <timurkz@saxz.mmbankz.ruz>

On Fri, 31 Dec 1999 08:18:47 +0100, Knud wrote:

>I have tried to install NETBIOS over TCPIP without anything change. I
>have also a WARP 4 installation on the WARP pc with same result.
>I am running FP40 and WR08620+ the AFNB fix. ( I was using WR08610
>before with same result ).

Check your IBMLAN.INI file for the similar lines:

  net2 = TCPBEUI$,1,LM10,100,150,14
  ...
  wrknets = NET1 NET2


With best regards,
Timur Kazimirov

-- Remove all "z" from my address to reply



--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Bank of Moscow, Sakhalin Branch (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: hemo_jr@attglobal.net                             31-Dec-99 08:57:11
  To: All                                               31-Dec-99 14:29:28
Subj: Re: OS2 warp 4 in a NT enviornment

From: "Matt Hickman" <hemo_jr@attglobal.net>

In <386C30F1.56D9E832@attglobal.net>, on 12/30/99 
   at 11:28 PM, Alon Stewart <abstewa@attglobal.net> said:

>My mistake on the Netbeui, I do have TCPbeui as the protocol.  At one time
>I had both but I removed the Netbeui, but without success with the Wins
>server.  Another strange thing is although I don't have localhost
>configured because it interferes with my Exceed X-window software, whenever
>I address any TCP/IP request to localhost I get the response from the
>Domain Name Server and not my local PC.   I know that the request to the
>Wins server is getting to the server because I have changed the server IP
>in the dhcpd.cfg file and get an error saying the server is not a name
>server.   I think something is configured wrong, but I just can't find it. 
>Any ideas?

Do you have your node-type set up as hybrid?  Your netbios name server
with the IP address of your WINS server? (both via MPTN)

-- 
Matt Hickman
  government'd classify sex if they could.
                         Robert A. Heinlein (1907 - 1988)
                         _The Door Into Summer_ 1956

** Join "The Heinleiners" a SETI@home club **
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_17222.html

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & Ne
(1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From: zuercher@bright.net                               31-Dec-99 06:09:08
  To: All                                               31-Dec-99 19:52:06
Subj: Help!  DOIP dosn't like my ISP (Warp 3)

From: Todd Zuercher <zuercher@bright.net>

I can not get DOIP to work with my ISP (who's tech support is no help at
all).  When I try to dial in, DOIP connects, logs in, I recive the
connection speed then I get invalid protical 2080 and invalid fcs ad
nosium.  My ISP only supports PPP.  I thought I had the DOIP switched
over to PPP (after much scrounging for the right stuff to upgrade it and
enable the PPP)

I am getting tired of dual booting to DOS to do some internet work then
back to OS/2 to see if what I found out or down loaded works.  Only to
find that it doesn't.
-- 
===========================================

Todd Zuercher
mailto:zuercher@bright.net

===========================================

--- WtrGate+ v0.93.p7 sn 165
 * Origin: Usenet: bright.net Ohio (1:109/42)

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+============================================================================+
