Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
RFC 1157 - 3.2.5. Definition of Administrative Relationships

Top: Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
Up: Requests For Comments
Up: RFC 1157
Up: 3. The SNMP Architecture
Up: 3.2. Elements of the Architecture
Prev: 3.2.4. Form and Meaning of Protocol Exchanges
Next: 3.2.6. Form and Meaning of References to Managed Objects

### 3.2.5. Definition of Administrative Relationships

The SNMP architecture admits a variety of administrative relationships among entities that participate in the protocol. The entities residing at management stations and network elements which communicate with one another using the SNMP are termed SNMP application entities. The peer processes which implement the SNMP, and thus support the SNMP application entities, are termed protocol entities.

A pairing of an SNMP agent with some arbitrary set of SNMP application entities is called an SNMP community. Each SNMP community is named by a string of octets, that is called the community name for said community.

An SNMP message originated by an SNMP application entity that in fact belongs to the SNMP community named by the community component of said message is called an authentic SNMP message. The set of rules by which an SNMP message is identified as an authentic SNMP message for a particular SNMP community is called an authentication scheme. An implementation of a function that identifies authentic SNMP messages according to one or more authentication schemes is called an authentication service.

Clearly, effective management of administrative relationships among SNMP application entities requires authentication services that (by the use of encryption or other techniques) are able to identify authentic SNMP messages with a high degree of certainty. Some SNMP implementations may wish to support only a trivial authentication service that identifies all SNMP messages as authentic SNMP messages.

For any network element, a subset of objects in the MIB that pertain to that element is called a SNMP MIB view. Note that the names of the object types represented in a SNMP MIB view need not belong to a single sub-tree of the object type name space.

An element of the set { READ-ONLY, READ-WRITE } is called an SNMP access mode.

A pairing of a SNMP access mode with a SNMP MIB view is called an SNMP community profile. A SNMP community profile represents specified access privileges to variables in a specified MIB view. For every variable in the MIB view in a given SNMP community profile, access to that variable is represented by the profile according to the following conventions:

1. if said variable is defined in the MIB with "Access:" of "none," it is unavailable as an operand for any operator;

2. if said variable is defined in the MIB with "Access:" of "read-write" or "write-only" and the access mode of the given profile is READ-WRITE, that variable is available as an operand for the get, set, and trap operations;

3. otherwise, the variable is available as an operand for the get and trap operations.

4. In those cases where a "write-only" variable is an operand used for the get or trap operations, the value given for the variable is implementation-specific.

A pairing of a SNMP community with a SNMP community profile is called a SNMP access policy. An access policy represents a specified community profile afforded by the SNMP agent of a specified SNMP community to other members of that community. All administrative relationships among SNMP application entities are architecturally defined in terms of SNMP access policies.

For every SNMP access policy, if the network element on which the SNMP agent for the specified SNMP community resides is not that to which the MIB view for the specified profile pertains, then that policy is called a SNMP proxy access policy. The SNMP agent associated with a proxy access policy is called a SNMP proxy agent. While careless definition of proxy access policies can result in management loops, prudent definition of proxy policies is useful in at least two ways:

1. It permits the monitoring and control of network elements which are otherwise not addressable using the management protocol and the transport protocol. That is, a proxy agent may provide a protocol conversion function allowing a management station to apply a consistent management framework to all network elements, including devices such as modems, multiplexors, and other devices which support different management frameworks.

2. It potentially shields network elements from elaborate access control policies. For example, a proxy agent may implement sophisticated access control whereby diverse subsets of variables within the MIB are made accessible to different management stations without increasing the complexity of the network element.

By way of example, Figure 1 illustrates the relationship between management stations, proxy agents, and management agents. In this example, the proxy agent is envisioned to be a normal Internet Network Operations Center (INOC) of some administrative domain which has a standard managerial relationship with a set of management agents.

       +------------------+       +----------------+      +----------------+
       |  Region #1 INOC  |       |Region #2 INOC  |      |PC in Region #3 |
       |                  |       |                |      |                |
       |Domain=Region #1  |       |Domain=Region #2|      |Domain=Region #3|
       |CPU=super-mini-1  |       |CPU=super-mini-1|      |CPU=Clone-1     |
       |PCommunity=pub    |       |PCommunity=pub  |      |PCommunity=slate|
       |                  |       |                |      |                |
       +------------------+       +----------------+      +----------------+
              /|\                      /|\                     /|\
               |                        |                       |
               |                        |                       |
               |                       \|/                      |
               |               +-----------------+              |
               +-------------->| Region #3 INOC  |<-------------+
                               |                 |
                               |Domain=Region #3 |
                               |CPU=super-mini-2 |
                               |PCommunity=pub,  |
                               |         slate   |
                               |DCommunity=secret|
               +-------------->|                 |<-------------+
               |               +-----------------+              |
               |                       /|\                      |
               |                        |                       |
               |                        |                       |
              \|/                      \|/                     \|/
       +-----------------+     +-----------------+       +-----------------+
       |Domain=Region#3  |     |Domain=Region#3  |       |Domain=Region#3  |
       |CPU=router-1     |     |CPU=mainframe-1  |       |CPU=modem-1      |
       |DCommunity=secret|     |DCommunity=secret|       |DCommunity=secret|
       +-----------------+     +-----------------+       +-----------------+

       Domain:  the administrative domain of the element
       PCommunity:  the name of a community utilizing a proxy agent
       DCommunity:  the name of a direct community

                                     Figure 1
                     Example Network Management Configuration

Next: 3.2.6. Form and Meaning of References to Managed Objects

Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
RFC 1157 - 3.2.5. Definition of Administrative Relationships