Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
RFC 1904 - 5.4.3. Mapping of the OBJECT clause

Top: Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
Up: Requests For Comments
Up: RFC 1904
Up: 5. Mapping of the MODULE-COMPLIANCE macro
Up: 5.4. Mapping of the MODULE clause
Prev: 5.4.2. Mapping of the GROUP clause
Next: 5.4.3.1. Mapping of the SYNTAX clause

### 5.4.3. Mapping of the OBJECT clause

The OBJECT clause, which need not be present, is repeatedly used to name each MIB object for which compliance has a refined requirement with respect to the MIB module definition. The MIB object must be present in one of the conformance groups named in the correspondent MANDATORY-GROUPS clause or GROUP clauses.

By definition, each object specified in an OBJECT clause follows a MODULE clause which names the information module in which that object is defined. Therefore, the use of an IMPORTS statement, to specify from where such objects are imported, is redundant and is not required in an information module.

5.4.3.1. Mapping of the SYNTAX clause
5.4.3.2. Mapping of the WRITE-SYNTAX clause
5.4.3.3. Mapping of the MIN-ACCESS clause

Next: 5.4.3.1. Mapping of the SYNTAX clause

Connected: An Internet Encyclopedia
RFC 1904 - 5.4.3. Mapping of the OBJECT clause